People in general, but particularly in the USA, like to punish individuals or entities for unacceptable behaviors through financial avenues, that result in punishing themselves or punishing other entities that had nothing to do with the unacceptable action, which essentially results in collective punishment with the hopes that the ones unjustly punished will punish the offenders further? And stop all future objectionable behaviors?
How naive is that? How foolish is that? You’d rather a pound of flesh than a multi-billion dollar contract? So it benefits everyone? But the offenders? The immediate offenders are always dealt with.
You know, this continual need for revenge at the expense of progress and development and moving the world forward is moving certain players backwards.
So the Jews are calling for everybody’s heads unless they get a piece of the multi-billion dollar contract action. Looked like that guy was part Jew anyway. Can we prove it? We don’t have to.
Don’t give the Jews a dime. Get them off our coats. That they came out so quickly, before anybody else, to state their claim via their greasy black-haired costumed presence on Fox news, speaks their intent via opportunity, or their end game via complicity. More like both. Trump emboldened Israel by the embassy move to Jerusalem.
They want in on anything contractual – anywhere in Arab Territory. They’re already looking down the road at building contracts in Syria. First they had to bomb the cement to powder, so they could do as the USA always does, make peace then rebuild. The Israeli way is different though. They plan on a big payday from the USA to help them rebuild Syria. Where’s the Russia collusion? What an effective DECOY that was planned by Israeli Russians.
If someone does something egregious, do not under any circumstances apply a punishment that will also punish the offended or the entity meting out the punishment or anyone not directly involved.
What is the purpose in that, except to imply that the offended somewhat or somehow shares blame for the act or acts committed.
In the USA we do not punish the entire family because one member acts out or breaks the law (The United Nations is a big supporter of that policy, by the way, under the rules of occupation, bulldozing the family house where a terrorist was born.). Just because the United Nations condones the vendetta policies of Peoples, that doesn’t make it law that one must carry out collective vengeance.
Even Israel said it didn’t work. The wall is what stopped the attacks, not the Palestinian’s ‘will’ to attack. (That’s something Israel needs to work on – not caring who hates them.) Getting along with people is a necessary component of progress. The Jews leave that out of their strategies, which always proves to be a mistake. On the other hand, if someone refuses to civilize themselves, then who can blame the reaction when nothing ever works except complete submission to their ‘will’. It is not in the human animal’s nature to submit when there is no benefit.
Where there is a ‘will’ there is a way.
That’s why Israel purposely leaves out solutions that would alter the ‘will’. They’d have no leverage if the Palestinians stopped wanting to attack them.