CHINA doesn’t need our factories anymore; they can build and maintain their own. All they need is a market.
We need to get out and let them be self-sufficient. Not to would be exploitive on our part.
~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight
CHINA doesn’t need our factories anymore; they can build and maintain their own. All they need is a market.
We need to get out and let them be self-sufficient. Not to would be exploitive on our part.
~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight
Massive numbers of people (or one person) forcing themselves onto another country without consent = RAPE of that country.
Spanish speaking peoples SOTB prey on people’s vulnerabilities for profit, forcing those vulnerable to NEED them.
HOW DO THEY DO THAT and get away with it?
DECEIT. Everything in their lives, everything they do is a product of deceit. They lie about everything. It becomes reflexive when you live and work underground.
Border People have been kissing up to RICH PEOPLE of the USA for decades, demanding to be their slaves, begging them to work for pennies on the dollar (just provide for us; we don’t need nor want much, and we have women too, we’ll take care of your kids, you don’t have to declare us or pay taxes on us), flipping the Slave Bird at the Blacks who wanted to be free. And now they’re staging a coup to take down the KING who refused their offer. I’ll tell ya somethin, if there’s one BIG mean BIRD who you’re gonna have a tough time taking down, it’s that one.
You should hear these Chippers all over Facebook trying to recruit people to join their coup attempt. Wow. President Donald J. Trump said no to the slave offer.
So all those rich asses you kissed all those decades aren’t coming through for you. Even though they know you’ve got stuff on them – MONITORING them, as you call it, in their own mansions, all the while pretending you didn’t speak English. Do those tapes even still play? I mean can you actually find a device that plays those antiquated tape recordings?
They thought it was a slam dunk, a walk in the park, a shoot yourself in the foot moment that miraculously heals itself, no evidence no proof. And then he came along and everybody forced a conscience onto him.
What? what? Mr. President, remember us. Us? The slaves. We’re your slaves. All kings need slaves. We’re your happy slaves. You know, like the vegans have happy cows.
We want you to succeed. But with us. We put you here. We just pretended that we didn’t. That’s how we are. Thought you knew it man. Okay, okay. The wall is okay, as long as you put a side door into it. Wink, wink. You know us; we know you know us. Don’t pay any attention to what that old woman says. She’s nobody. We hate her. She’s so poor. It’s laughable.
IS IT ANY WONDER that all the rich people on television, in politics, in business are jumping out of their trees in support of a Wall War? Take the focus off of us and what we did and put it on an inanimate object. THE WALL WAR OF 2019.
Man, all those wannabe slaves ruined it for everybody who didn’t wanna be a slave. How do you talk human rights, freedom rights when a whole new breed of people SOTB comes along and wants to be enslaved? Talk about exploiting rich people’s vulnerabilities. Sure, everybody likes free stuff. But notice that these slaves didn’t work for non-rich people who could probably have afforded them. No, no. They went where the big money was. It was part of the LONG DISTANCE COUP PLAN.
Most coups are internal. They knew that. But they had no power SOTB, so go north of the border (NOTB) and attach themselves to rich people. That’s where the main financial energy grid lies.
Politics is a long game.
A coup appears on the surface to be quick. Yes. The element of surprise is everything – for a coup to succeed.
It’s the planning that takes a long time.
Can one person stop a coup?
It depends what language you speak.
HWH Comment: The word ‘meat’ does not clearly come from livestock as Sen. Carol Blood claims. Meat has historically been used to refer to many types of plant food. Sen. Carol Blood should focus on turning Nebraska’s animal slaughter industries into plant meat industries or technology or anything other than continuing selling for consumption the atrocities committed against cattle and all other ‘destined for our plate’ animals. She lacks vision, hope, ingenuity and a better plan for the future of Nebraska. I’d say Nebraska needs a better advocate than one who advocates holding onto an industry that’s doomed.
There is no truth in advertising cattle as livestock. They’re deadstock. There is no truth to the claim that animals are on this earth as a food for human consumption. Animals are not food, except in the deviant minds of those who thirst for the blood and flesh of other creatures. Or by those who raise and sell victims of torture and slaughter for profit.
LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — More than four months after Missouri became the first U.S. state to regulate the term “meat” on product labels, Nebraska’s powerful farm groups are pushing for similar protection from veggie burgers, tofu dogs and other items that look and taste like real meat.
Nebraska lawmakers will consider a bill this year to prevent companies that package and sell food from advertising plant-based, insect-based and lab-grown products as meat. Similar measures are pending in Tennessee, Virginia and Wyoming.
The issue strikes a particularly strong chord in Nebraska, one of the nation’s top states for livestock production, where cars roll down the interstate with “Beef State” license plates and the governor each year proclaims May as “Beef Month.”
Farm groups have found an unusual ally in state Sen. Carol Blood, a city-dwelling vegetarian from the Omaha suburb of Bellevue. Blood, who grew up on a farm, said she introduced the measure because agriculture is Nebraska’s largest industry and needs to be protected for the good of the whole state.“
I’m not bringing this bill to tell people what they can and can’t eat,” she said. “All I’m asking for is truth in advertising. It’s clear that meat comes from livestock, and livestock is our livelihood in Nebraska.”
Nebraska led the nation in commercial red meat production in 2017 and had the most feed cows as of last year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock and livestock product sales generated an estimated $12.1 billion for the state’s economy in 2016, according to the USDA’s most recent available data.
The measure is certain to face resistance from food producers that sell plant-based alternatives, as well as those working with the emerging science of meat grown by culturing cells in a lab. Critics say the bill infringes on the free-speech rights of companies that produce vegetarian alternatives to real meat.
The Good Food Institute, the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and plant-based food company Tofurkey have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Missouri law . They argue the law unfairly stifles competition.
The Nebraska bill “would censor food labels and create consumer confusion where there is none,” said Jessica Almy, director of policy for the Washington-based Good Food Institute. “You can’t censor speech just to promote one industry’s financial success.”…
FINISH READING: Beef-friendly Nebraska eyes regulations on the word ‘meat’
Nancy Pelosi has a huge constituency of professional cocaine users in California – professionals who vote.
She needs to be recused along with her colleagues who represent states with high cocaine and heroin usage for a conflict of interest when called to participate in any form of legislation or action regarding the application of a physical structure designed to keep out illicit drugs and people coming from regions where drug cartels exist south of the USA border.
Politicians from high drug use states are no different from politicians from high drug producing and exporting countries. Money works the same way on both sides of the southern border to influence politicians, law enforcement and judges to look the other way or to vocally oppose those trying to stop the drug flow and the people coming to the USA to set up underground distribution points and supporting peripheral services.
Everybody knows how to hide money. Even a dog knows how to hide what they don’t want you to see. When you see politicians tipping off their constituency to upcoming ICE raids, you know they’re bought and/or expecting compensation.
When you see politicians fight tooth and nail against the building of a low-cost physical structure on the southern border as a deterrent to illegal immigration, you know they receive benefit, in some form, for appeasing and giving aid and comfort to the cartels operating within the USA.
It’s a done deal. They are as corrupt as the politicians and police in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and any other country that benefits from the drug trade. They all benefit.
Many politicians openly use as an excuse for their inaction and their objection to a physical structure at the southern border that the cartels will just find another way to enter.
Yes. They will. And when they do, we’ll be there.
The USA must show these cartels and their satellite organized crime syndicates, that are allowed to freely operate with impunity in our country by our own paid-off politicians and law enforcement, that we have the will to stop them at every point of entry.
The FBI needs to immediately start investigating those congresspeople who most vehemently opposed a construction process designed to slow the flow of hard drugs and drug cartel-related people as well as all the wannabe El Chapos into the USA. Those politicians who tip off offending parties to raids by ICE or any other law enforcement agency must be stripped of their title and prosecuted.
Those in congress who openly defy the president’s desires and plans to protect this country from being ravaged by these cartels have been bought off and are running like little sissies screaming to the enemy that they’re with them not the USA> Our own congresspeople have flipped.
The Democrats led by Nancy Pelosi, Speaker Of The House, are lobbying on behalf of the drone industry to use drones instead of cement to keep the floods of people wanting to cross over into the USA illegally from south of the USA border from doing so. A national security issue has turned into a lobbyist special interest windfall potential for companies that make drones.
There’s no money in cement Chuck Schumer might as well have said, when he smirked and body languaged his disdain for anything concrete. After all, there’s no money nor votes in it for him, Nancy Pelosi or any one of their 11% approval rated congressional colleagues. Cement isn’t the gift that keeps giving as drones appear to be. Drones don’t fly themselves and you need a lot of them to secure the border, plus the maintenance and training of bilingual people to operate them.
At least be honest about it. If a wall is immoral, then drones are even more invasive thus immoral. Congress or anybody else can decide at any given time to stop flying the drones. You can’t stop the function of a wall once it’s built. The deterrent is always there. There is no manipulative power with a wall, as there is with drones, which is what the Democrats want.
Massive numbers of drones will create chaos. People will get shot. Drones will be damaged. Nancy Pelosi is thinking Afghanistan where operators in the USA conducted drone strikes on people standing on street corners, or who drove caravans of vehicles to any location. The use of massive numbers of drones by people not sufficiently trained will start a war. And she’s okay with all of that.
Sure drones are useful, but without a barrier, no. We’re not at war yet, so the drones have to be protecting something, which is a wall. If there’s no wall, then anybody can cross the border who is not spotted and pursued by a drone. And what will that do, except put a lot of DEA and Homeland Security agents in danger who have to go after them in trucks once they are spotted after they’ve crossed the border. The Democrats are risking the lives of our own agents for drone contracts without fully understanding the ramifications.
This isn’t a video game, where drone operators can simply pop every person crossing the border illegally.
A drone isn’t a deterrant. People can figure out when they’re flown or get the intel from spies and pass it along. There’s no predictions needed with a wall. It’s always there, so people can’t find out the times that it’s up and the times that it’s down. It’s always up. That’s the deterrant.
Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer want to give the drone industry billions of dollars when they haven’t thought this through. Go back and watch how members of congress responded to Mark Zuckerberg from Facebook. They were totally ignorant of computers and Facebook. They are even more ignorant of drones. All they know is what they see in movies.
If I don’t have a ‘no trespassing’ sign with a fence around my property, then people will assume they can be on it. Without a wall, how will the USA win in court against an invasion by people claiming it their right to be here?
This isn’t the Berlin Wall or even the Wall in Israel/Palestine. Those walls created borders that didn’t previously exist, dividing cities and neighborhoods. The USA already has a border. Everybody in the area knows the border. That’s where The People’s Wall goes. People can still go back and forth if they’re legal.
It’s like toll booths to get onto a highway. Why do we have toll booths, if they don’t work? People pay – they are forced to pay – to use the road. If you don’t pay, then find another way to get where you’re going. I think people should pay a toll for crossing over the southern border, given the huge costs to the tax payers in our country for social services because of their disruptive, illegal actions.
What’s immoral is encouraging people to come to a country where they don’t speak the language to do slave labor, to live in poverty and as outlaws generation after generation. That’s immoral. That is perpetuating the cycle of slavery. Forcing them to do jobs that supposedly nobody who is an actual citizen wants is immoral. If you want to move up the socio-economic ladder, you have to speak English or forever be strapped to jobs where only Spanish-speaking people work with Spanish-speaking bosses. Taking advantage of somebody’s economic status like that and then making the process of citizenship so lengthy and cumbersome with fines attached is immoral.
Slavery is alive and well in the USA
A Wall says, go back and work it out in a better way than what you’ll get here. A Wall doesn’t violate human rights. Why do citizens of Mexico, Central and South America have more rights in the USA than USA citizens? A Wall protects the rights of people already here. A Wall is not immoral. Slavery is immoral.
Yeah, Chuck Schumer had dollar signs in his eyes. Drones are the new building contracts to the Israelis.
There’s profit to made in drones, not cement.
The bottom line is that a wall is a deterrent; drones are not.
Drones can only function optimally when there is an actual wall to protect from a breach. Otherwise it’s wide open spaces. How can you say someone breached a wide open space? Border? What border? You mean there’s a border here? Hey man, I was just taking my dog for a walk.
Outposts won’t work either. They’re too small. They’re not efficient.
The current path to citizenship in the USA is a path to nowhere.
Donald Trump didn’t create this mess, but he sure has the courage to take it on.
This citizen would like to see some courage from the 11% approval rated congress and senate. Resistance is a weak strategy for change. You all made the mess by profiting from slave labor and human suffering, now clean it up. Opening the border to exploitation by foreign entities is not a solid solution. It’s a strategic nightmare.
Considering that Hillary Clinton still can’t wrap her mind around losing the presidential election to Donald Trump, it’s clear that the country made the right decision in choosing her opponent.
From 2016 to 2019 and she still can’t move past it. Three years in the pit.
Vision and the ability to think on one’s feet are two qualities necessary in an effective leader. The way Hillary Clinton handled her defeat proved that she lacks both.
Nobody wants a leader who can’t rise from the ashes quickly.
For all her supposed support for women’s rights, she played the stereotypical woman who crumbles under pressure, and stayed crumbled.
I’m beginning to think she’s mentally ill.
I’m giving you the tagline right off the bat, so you lazy activist readers who like to jump on whatever it is that anybody else is saying or doing that doesn’t line up with your distorted perception of reality can move on to your next target.
Picking the wrong battles to fight, because something pops up on your radar and because it did, it must be designed specifically for you to raise, or because you think you might just be able to make it fit, while the real battles, the ones of substance – the gut-wrenching glory battles – pass you by.
This is called DEATH OF A MOVEMENT WISH.
American women make the same mistakes American blacks make to keep themselves irrelevant, thus enslaved.
They pick up every argument – shotgun approach – whether it fits the discrimination or not. They work it to death trying to force-fit it to their agenda and in the end lose ground.
People see through that. They see the hypocrisy of a goal that justifies any means to attain it, making it look like you’d rather shed somebody’s blood than pursue a diplomatic solution. The activists driving these HATE AND DESTROY CAMPAIGNS to achieve their agendas state as their reason, that all conflict must at some point along the continuum to resolution result in violence and bloodshed and a significant amount of loss in order to bring all sides to the resolution table.
It sounds like war mongering to most ears. Violence and hatred is not a prerequisite for social or any other category of change.
When people see activists exhibit the same behavior they protest, the populace and the shakers and movers turn against the protestors and their message. Any cause needs those people at minimum to agree with your goals. But none have been stated. Women and blacks never state the goal. What do you want? They’re afraid if they say, they might get it, and regret not asking for more? We shouldn’t have to ask? Then why are you protesting? Using that logic, you shouldn’t have to protest either.
Every individual in the movement has a different demand.
Who do you think the government is, God? You’re talking to people here, not making a wish to your God. State what you want, the way you want this country, this world to be, detailed. Or they put droves of ignorant talking heads on cable news shows to act ignorant, as if ignorance will make the shakers and movers get for you what you want?
Really? That’s a strategy?
You’re all pathetic. Get off the stage, till you have something of substance to say, then say it in a succinct, positive, good for all, way.
You claim to be better, to know and possess a better way, but you don’t act or show it.
You trivialize the woman and the black by focusing on trivial offenses. Using the nigger word, or grabbing somebody’s crotch in a high school party free for all? He tried to kiss me and grabbed at my clothes? Well, he called me the same thing as the nigger word, he bitch me?
You really do have a Death Of A Movement Wish (DOAMW). You don’t even want to be doing this.
Making up scenarios that you think happen all the time, so you ‘Hollywood’ it, like Hollywood does with the news, using actors as the OPINIONS of the people on the street interviewed for news shows. For entertainment purposes or to sway public opinion? Making black waiters scribble “i don’t tip black people’ on the restaurant bill, claiming a white customer did it, then stand all smiles while the cameras click away? And you just happened to have the telephone number of a major mainline news source junkie?
The best move the congressional democrats can make now: Vote YES for Brett Kavanaugh as Supreme Court Justice
You know you wanted him. The others convinced you that they could bring him to his knees, because of his Irish roots, forcing him to change his views to your way of thinking. He was the most malleable. They stereotyped him. He’s Irish – a slam dunk, walk in the park NO. He’s Irish. They drink a lot and when they drink a lot, they womanize – a stereotype that everybody gets regardless of how unfair it is. Democrats are the party of fair for all marginalized groups. Who forgot that? Who started this parade? You went after the IRISH? Hm-m.
Dems Vote YES for Kavanaugh.
We did our due diligence. We’re convinced he will be fair in matters that concern us – (especially now that we’ve destroyed his family and friends using the Irish stereotype lol. Just kidding BK; we knew you could handle it. Hey, we know where your children go to school.lol.).
Right now as I write, there are thousands of young women and children being drugged and raped by their trafficking handlers to be sold into slavery, right here in the USA. It’s happening in Cleveland, Ohio, and even in the building where I live. There are not enough allocated resources to handle the volume of cases yet to be discovered.
And yet, congressional democrats in Washington DC think it’s a more prudent utilization of time and resources for the FBI (Federal Bureau Of Investigation) to get into their time capsule machines and time-travel back to 1972 to peep on who was getting into whose pants in high school, for the purpose of coddling and appeasing those who wish to block a Supreme Court Justice nominee by calling into question the moral fitness of said person who allegedly groped a teen apparently of the opposite sex, while at a high school party, where there was underage drinking.
If this is the future litmus test for Supreme Court nominees or any other position, you might as well disqualify all men from consideration.
It appears that the underlying motive for creating this ‘high school boy and girl’ sex spectacle is to assure in the future that only women get nominated to these powerful positions. Both teenagers were underage at the time, which means the FBI would have needed parental permission to delve into the sexual behaviors of their respective teenage children.
Whatever is discovered by the FBI by time-flying back to 1972 will not be credible enough to use in a court of law. It will all be heresay from 36 years ago. If it’s not credible enough to be used in a court of law to prove there was a crime committed, when a sex act did not occur, but even if it did, who is to say whether it was consensual or not consensual, then it cannot be used to block a nomination. The FBI would then be rightly accused of colluding with congressional democrats to take down the current president’s nominee for the Supreme Court and replacing the president’s choice with a person the democrats want in that position. This takes away from the president his right to choose.
The process of approving a nominee is corrupted, when the opposing party forces the party members of the nominee to allow them to demand that the FBI investigate a situation where there was no crime committed in exchange for an up or down vote.
The timing of this allegation of groping points to the malicious attempt to malign a person’s reputation based on his political leanings and not his rabble rousing in high school. Do you all want your teen years to be held up for scrutiny by congressional democrats every time you apply for a job, a raise or a promotion? Do you want your teenage children to be forever tied to mistakes they may or may not have made in high school, just because someone sees an opportunity to destroy them 36 years later?
This is that slippery slope.
The FBI will be setting a precedent that can never be reversed.
Taking on an investigation of a high school party 36 years ago, where no crime was committed by the person who is being accused of groping and allegedly making someone so fearful of the grope that 36 years later she’s still publicly crying over it, will also malign the reputation of the FBI. The congressional democrats want only to destroy this person’s possibility of sitting on the court. They do not care who gets maligned in the process, or whose reputation it destroys. The end justifies the means for them.
Congressional democrats are not thinking rationally. I hope the FBI is.
According to news sources, and news sources say they never lie: the woman who testified was paid to date 700 thousand dollars by GOFUNDME accounts set up in her name. This is what needs to be investigated. She’s a doctor; she’s not poor nor in need of expensive surgery (she could afford it) – unless it’s the type of surgery not covered by insurance. This was a pay out for her performance.
Re:“The biggest threat to our democracy is indifference” said by Obama gearing up for campaigning for mid-term elections on his quest to save American democracy.
One thing to be sure about the world today, especially in America, there is no indifference – not from anyone nor any sector.
People from all walks hold strong views about everything.
Protests are more common throughout the land than ever. Social media is lit with power hungry reactionaries, wanting to change your thought process into theirs – again from all walks.
Americans are not standing still – no matter their agendas.
Words used in the past to stir a nation (such as ‘indifference’) are no longer useful.
Obama acts desperate to be president again, like Bill Clinton did. Once you have that power you never want to let it go. So hey, use it in a new, better way, not a way that didn’t work. Nobody is indifferent. Not now.
The biggest threat to democracy is people in authority using fear tactics to tell the populace how to vote. How about we hold those who campaign for an agenda to the same standards we demand of Donald Trump? It looks to me like nobody is playing by their own rules.
Politicians want Trump to solve all the problems they didn’t solve or currently can’t solve. So, they lay all the blame at his doorstep instead of their own. Rather than work with him, to change what they couldn’t or won’t, they attack and resist for the sake of resisting, till they get into office and everybody elected forgets what they promised to do to get that vote. The democrats are playing the same resist and wait till the next elections game that the republicans did.
What’s new and better about that strategy? Nothing. It’s more of the same. That’s why voter turnout is low, and has been for a long time. It’s not because of apathy on the part of the voters, it’s because of slow moving politicians who delay making decisions that will provoke change.
Tactical Abuse is the new strategy to produce that change. Hit them over their heads till they cave to your way is the lazy person’s game plan to change the world. That methodology used to be called the end justifies the means, or ‘whatever it takes’ as long as it gets done is worth the price of life and limb.
Has planet earth been invaded by a silent war organism that strips the brain of all logic and common sense and decency, so it can occupy the minds of humans for the purpose of taking over the planet?
It sure looks, walks and sounds it to me.
Not all democrats are worthy of the office they seek. Not all republicans are worthy of the office they seek. Yet each side pushes all their candidates down your throats till you choke and end up voting for no one.
Everybody knows that no matter who you vote for, not much is going to change, regardless of the party that lands the coveted seats.
Why did Obama promise Israel that he would move the American embassy to Jerusalem? To get the Jew vote he lied.
Part of the methodology of the Resistance Movement is to engage in the same behavior that members of the Resistance criticizes in the one they want to overthrow? Where’s the logic there?
This is not a planned political strategy of slinging mud at each other, because frankly the Resistance is the only side throwing anything. This is not done for the purpose of a ‘now you see what this looks like’ teaching moment, which is never effective by the way, but is done without purpose – that’s the sting that creates the chaos that the entire world feels when viewing what’s happening in American politics.
There is no purpose because there is no resistance, except what was created by a handful of zealots who control the media.
This isn’t the poor fighting the rich. This is rich famous powerful people fighting rich famous powerful people, using poor people as their pawns.
The media moguls saw a weak link in the way rich famous powerful people, who thought they were entitled to win a presidential election handle the stress of losing and exploited it.
You’re no better than the one(s) you criticize when you engage in the same behavior.
Dictators have the hardest time giving up their power. They can’t lose and stay sane.
Nancy Pelosi calls The President of the United States a Devil. “That devil over there”, as if he was standing right beside her. Maybe in her mind he was.
Nancy Pelosi along with her colleagues helped to usher facism in under the face of democracy in the U.S. There is no ‘we the people’ in the USA. Not me. Not you. My vote doesn’t exist. Neither does yours. The people who call themselves Antifa promoters are pro-facism, they just want to be the ones who dictate to the world how to run their countries.
One centralized government – theirs – in the real world always means all government all business all the time.
It’s the people – the people who don’t matter – that’s who the people are. Then there’s the conglomerate: all government all business all the time. Anybody who thinks in this age that government and business are not married to each other for better or worse is in denial.
It’s all government all business all the time and no poor peons are invited to the table, except to be used for exploitive purposes to keep the fame wealth power in the hands of those who control everybody else – all government all business all the time.
Neither Donald Trump nor President Trump created the immigration/occupation crisis in the USA. Whatever laws were passed or polices implemented had nothing to do with Donald Trump. Nancy Pelosi and every previous president signed off on all of them as did her colleagues.
She brought her facism in her DNA from Italy. She once said she raised her family like the military. I believe it.
Members of the democratic donkeys and some straggler republican cockroaches looking for a pay out are blocking financial deals that benefit the USA. The high pitch coming from the cords of those democrats signal fear of losing control of their cozy relationships with big business. That’s the tell – the shrill.
The shrill of defeat doesn’t last that long – not for almost two years. No. The shrill of losing your shirt does. Not your shirt, they’re not shrill over people who don’t matter losing their shirts because of the laws they pass to keep the wealthy comfortable. They’re afraid of losing their shirts, because they’re part of the all government all business all the time system.
When somebody gets elected who starts shaking up the status quo, putting the rich famous powerful in a position of losing personal private financial power, you can believe you’re going to hear some screeching.
They don’t want a leader who knows more about business than they do. They don’t want a leader who can make deals that they don’t have a personal private stake in.
Donald Trump is a leader who keeps his promises to the people. That we know. That we can trust. He has proven himself to be trustworthy in that regard.
Just be sure that what you ask is something that will benefit everybody and not just those who scream the loudest and become the most vulgar in their so-called pursuit of what they claim the world via the USA owes them, simply because they exist.
Oh, I almost forgot my tag line:
Nancy Pelosi is Benito Mussolini in Drag.
If she can do it I can do it. How do you like me now?
Who would have thought so many people wanting to be dictators existed in the USA Congress? It’s my way or no way. Vote them out everybody says, but nobody does. These wanna be dictators are undermining the success of ‘we the people’ as a nation – one nation, not two or three or five or twenty. A separate nation for every ethnic group under one nation? Is that what you really mean?
The Want, Will, and Hopes of the People
When citizens of one country forcefully occupy the land of another country against the laws of that country it’s called an occupation.
When an opposing government can’t overcome an opposing country by military force, they send their people to enter under the radar, disrupt the country, send money back to the motherland and eventually take the target country (in this case the USA) over from within.
What a coup! Instead of a military coup it is an illegal immigration coup.
Over fifteen million and rising Spanish-speaking illegal aliens is a Spanish Occupation of a foreign entity.
Israel’s playbook. Boy, that one crept up on most of you unnoticed.
Israel’s play. Israel’s hand. Israel can do it, we can do it.
Now there’s a disruption of the stability of a nation long in the making.
Anybody awake yet?
Maxine Waters democratic congressperson calls on her Trump-hating and white-hating nationwide constituency to refuse service to Trump supporters, aides and staff.
Look who’s telling who to drink out of some other fountain or get to the back of the bus, or off the bus, ‘everywhere they go harass them’.
Refuse service to white people who voted for Trump. If that isn’t racist I don’t know what is.
“They won’t be able to go to a restaurant, to a gas station to a shopping mall.”
That will backfire. Isn’t there some law against harassing public officials? Isn’t there some law against discriminating based on race or creed?
Isn’t there some law against extortion?
Isn’t it against the law for the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) to spy on United States citizens for the purpose of informing Maxine Waters and her anti-Trump and anti-white terrorists what restaurant I’m at, or gas station or grocery store at any given time?
She needs to step down from her post. She is clearly unfit to serve the American people.
No amount of apology will be acceptable. She is a racist, calling for public racist activity illegally using spy networks against people who legally voted in this so-called democracy.
Look, Russia doesn’t have to undermine the political system in the USA, Maxine Waters does it all on her own. Not taking her threats seriously would be a serious mistake.
Hey, I’ve got a question.
Why don’t all the black African protestors lobby and/or protest to end the death penalty in the USA?
Blacks aren’t against the death penalty, or if they are, they haven’t been vocal enough about it.
Too much work? Too difficult for you? You’d rather make the white people do it?
Make? You mean by force?
Blacks remain forever in the past silent over that huge human rights issue. Why not revisit a place that’s difficult to overcome – this time with collective effort on this singular issue that will have a huge ripple effect around the globe, because the USA finally saw the light and now other countries want to work with us, because we’re not being hypocrites any more.
Because it affects everybody and not only black people, you don’t like the optics? You help us, we don’t help you, that’s your mantra?
Well that will not work today. The only method that works that doesn’t get thrown into the frivolous category of the Madison Avenue trash bin is DISCIPLINE WORKS.
Changing the world means including everybody, not one group or one group now and another group later. It takes discipline, to bring all people together as individuals, instead of groups, to support one issue: the abolition of the death penalty on a national level, not state by state.
It’s all in, all the time, for all people, when it applies to people laws.
You can’t say black lives matter and the lives of those on death row don’t.
It seems to me that the ones protesting death by cop, should be anti-death penalty. Then why aren’t you? You’re accusing the police of being judge, jury and executioner. So go to the top. Abolish the death penalty. Make it so it can never be reversed.
This is one trickle down policy that can work. It has been shown to work in other countries. Abolish the death penalty and ‘we the people’ start treating more humanely people at all levels of the justice system.
You’re going to need everybody on board and frankly you’re alienating a lot of people with your see me, see me, see only me mantras.
Yes, the Jews are creating discord among the American populace using movies, news rooms and social media as their vehicle for their disruption.
It is those who write and edit and transmit the scripts via ear buds and teleprompters who determine the moods and actions of those who watch, listen and read. The problem isn’t with Russia, it’s with Israel and the Jews in America who have formed a country within a country, whose intelligence service has free reign to effect American politics and/or destroy the lives and families of individuals who don’t support them – in everything.
Call it what it is. Put the onus for disruption where it belongs. Squarely on the Jews.
It’s okay according to the Jews who control American media by writing the scripts for news anchors and guests, when Peter Fonda, a movie star, calls for his followers on Twitter to kidnap the President’s and First Lady’s underage son and lock him in a cage with pedophiles, and then to call for those same Twitter followers to publish the names of all ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) agents, locate the schools where their children attend and do the same thing. Maybe they’ll blow up the schools while they’re at it. Peter Fonda takes the tweets down, apologizes and goes on his way with a new film soon to be released and others on the horizon with no tarnishment to his career.
On the other hand, Roseanne Barr, star on a television sitcom that lauds the republican party, refers to Valerie Jarret, advisor to past president Obama, as looking like a cross between an ape and a muslim in a tweet and she loses her show.
What a difference there is between the two. Say somebody looks like an ape and you’re fired. Call for your Twitter followers to kidnap and sodomize the president’s young son and then do the same to the children of all ICE agents and life goes on with no consequences.
So democrats and Jews really DON’T care about anybody’s children as they claim. Most ICE agents are Spanish-speaking, so they don’t care about their children either.
The Jews disrupting America via the media need to be exposed. So Peter Fonda pulled the pedophile stunt against a young boy five days before the release of his film to get free publicity? Maybe Peter Fonda is a pedophile and the Jews know it, covered for it, and made him pull that ugly stunt to get free publicity for his films. They’re the ones who always say, bad publicity is still publicity.
Just any young boy wouldn’t do. It had to be the son of somebody famous. I heard a black African male on one of the cable news shows call president Trump a pedophile when he couldn’t win his argument. Nothing happened to him either.
Maybe they did the same thing with Roseanne Barr. Only her tweet was nothing in comparison to the harm Peter Fonda’s did. There was no harm done in Rosanne’s instance. I’ve read via the Jew media for decades that people look like their dogs. White people don’t get offended by being compared to an animal. How many snakes do you know? Rats? Reptiles? Nobody loses their careers, because nobody makes a fuss.
Not many Jews, Muslims nor Africans like dogs – generally speaking. They call them dumb animals. “You dog”. You dirty dog”. Nobody makes a fuss. They keep their mouths shut. Who cares if you walk like an elephant or look like a pig? A person has to be pretty dumb to call any and all other species dumb. According to whose standards of dumbness?
I mean if you want to go there, well…it’s dumb to pretend you have a gun in front of a police officer. It’s dumb to run from police after they find two weapons in your car. It’s even dumber to try to grab a police officer’s gun…I mean the dumb stuff could go on forever.
Roseanne did according to some shed a negative light on the return of THE PLANET OF THE APES movie. I loved watching that movie, thinking, oh my God these are my ancestors. If they could have spoken my language this might have been what they’d be saying. Most all animals have the same organs, so we all share that commonality. And we’re all animals. It’s just that the black African people have this grossly unfair prejudice that results in horrific deeds committed against all other animals, including each other. I think it’s dumb that blacks don’t know that they’re part of the animal kingdom.
In recent months with the influx of Africans arriving in the USA and coming to the Cleveland area I noticed a stunning resemblance between apes and blacks – mostly in the face and the way they move their eyes back and forth. Even their gestures when they get drunk, swinging their arms low, making strange noises, pounding their feet on the floor, pounding the bar, engaging in lewd acts, screaming to get the attention of everyone in the place for no reason except they want to be looked at. See me. See me. Frankly I don’t want to look when you’re rubbing some woman’s private parts from behind. It’s offensive.
A firm non-compromising message needs to be sent to Sony Pictures for releasing Peter Fonda’s film, that no star or staff involved in any of its films can get away with calling for millions of followers to kidnap and sodomize young children.
I thought this outfit was owned by the Japanese. There was not one Japanese face that I recognized as anything close to Japanese in the total New York City corporate and divisional executives roster for Sony Pictures.
Oddly Peter Fonda’s new film is called “Boundaries”.
Just to make one thing more clear: The Jew Media Mafia for decades refers to as a ‘rant’ anything anyone says or writes in a lengthy discourse on anything that some group may find offensive. It’s usually unintelligible. They call them rants to denote ‘crazy’. Tweets can’t be rants. They’re not long enough, no matter how many tweets are run in succession. A ranting tweet? Really? You think the populace even cares?
The Jews, who disrupt American life, care that you all stay disrupted and keep fighting and hating each other. It makes it easier to steal what they want, when the entire country is distracted – like moving the USA embassy to Jerusalem.
Chuck Schumer, Senate Minority Leader from New York city needs to be investigated for collusion with Israel and Israeli agents.
I loved that jacket Melania Trump wore, by the way. “I don’t really care. Do U.”
Roseanne Barr did nothing wrong.
Peter Fonda committed a criminal act against several minors.
The terror wing of the Resistant movement in the USA with Hillary Clinton, Michelle and Barack Obama and James Comey as its figureheads justifies sodomy against children to terrorize families into supporting their agendas at the voting booths. That’s quite the democracy they’ve developed.
The USA can’t be the babysitters of the world. Nor can they be the domestic abuse police of the world, taking in all families where the husbands beat the wives or otherwise oppress them. It is the society that oppresses. These abusive cultures need to work out their own human rights and abuse issues.
We have those same issues in this country. All these people from all these countries claiming to be abused, bring their abusive cultures with them. All they do is continue the abuse in a different place. It never ends till people rise up within their own cultures to address the issue. Going to another country is not the answer.
So how does a woman divorce a husband from another country while she is living in this country, and why is it our problem? The women are the ones who accept the conditions of their cultures. It is a worldwide problem. Moving people around from country to country is not solving anything; it’s creating more problems associated with culture shock.
This domestic abuse reason for illegally entering the country is a scam. Their husbands will arrive at a later date and they’ll all be reunited. The news stories got this one wrong. How do the people in the USA tell husbands of other countries not to beat or disrespect their wives and children? The same cultures that accept domestic abuse as normal already exist in the USA. Those men are already here by the millions.
Wake up to reality.
Wouldn’t you think that with all the Spanish-speaking countries and islands in the world, that Spanish-speaking people wanting to move elsewhere would choose a country that at least speaks their language? It doesn’t make any sense. They’re all bad? Unfit for human occupation?
Frankly, any parent who subjects their’s or anybody else’s children to the horrors, rigors and life-threatening, humiliating experiences of traveling to parts unknown to enter a country illegally should be charged with child endangerment. Period.
The Southern border policy of detaining people who involve their children in a crime against the USA by entering this country illegally is called enforcement of existing immigration and asylum laws.
Separating children from adults is a common practice around the globe upon incarceration. That’s why they have juvenile facilities with boys separate from girls, and adult prisons with men separate from women. It is for the safety of the children and women.
When men are put in cages they rape. Everybody knows this. Nothing is done to stop it. When a man is convicted of a crime, rape is part of the sentence. Men rape men when there’s no women or children.
To put children in the same cages as men is cruel and unusual punishment.
These parents use their children to gain entry to the USA. These are not responsible, loving parents.
My question is where are the fifteen million illegal Spanish-speaking immigrants? Why aren’t they coming forward to claim their families as their responsibility? I thought they all have contacts in the USA. So where are they? Who is going to pay to house them, feed them, get them Spanish-speaking jobs, pay for their health care? The USA taxpayer.
Where will they work? They automatically go on welfare, because they have children? Does anybody even know if these parents really are the real parents of these children? Do they bring birth certificates with them? You mean asylum seekers don’t need birth certificates?
How will they get treated for the multitude of diseases they bring with them? Do they give out free condoms to all the men in with all the women? Even in Cleveland there’s a huge gonorrhea epidemic. It’s on billboards all over the city, on the sides and insides of buses, at RTA stations, even over the intercom, every so many minutes, while riding the bus one hears a loud burst from a person telling the riders to practice safe sex, then give a number to call for a free STD test. Drug-resistant gonorrhea is what they’re calling it. It’s recorded in English and Spanish.
I used to wonder why antibiotics were sold over the counter in Mexico. No prescription needed.
I used to think that Cleveland was a sanctuary city, because it has a large Spanish-speaking population that’s growing quickly. A while ago there was an article on Yahoo or some other news outlet listing all the sanctuary cities in the USA. I didn’t see Cleveland on it.
Staff infections, sexually transmitted diseases, tuberculosis, scabies, parasites, bed bugs, lice, cockroaches and more come across the border. How about small pox and other infectious and/or communicable diseases? Why do you think they have medical clinics set up at these centers? What other diseases aren’t they telling the USA taxpayer who is footing the bill for all this? I think we should have a say.
These kids are property to these unfit parents. To force these children into such stressful situations is immoral.
Do you know the culture they come from? Dog fights, cock fights, wife-beating, child exploitation, molestation, adultery, thievery, assault are all common to Spanish-speaking cultures. They bring their culture with them. They stay among their own in the USA, so nothing changes in the home when they illegally enter another country to set up housekeeping.
Who would think that Spain would be the European country that ends up dominating the planet? Island communities. All of South America, maybe except Brazil, which is primarily Portuguese. All of Central America, Mexico. Soon they’ll take over the USA, then move onto Canada. A Spanish Coup.
Is Canada opening their borders like everybody wants the USA to do? Yeah, right. They want us to absorb all the poor people of the world, so they don’t have to. A Spanish Coup
Canada has a great social security system. Maybe they don’t like the cold.
I got on an elevator the other evening and the Spanish woman already on it looked at me and within seconds grunted at me in such a way, while giving me the evil eye, that I thought for a few seconds that she was threatening to eat me, and was holding herself back. I never saw her before, so I don’t know if she lives here. I don’t ever want to cross her path again. I’ve heard that sound before coming from a boar who was devouring somebody in a movie. I since have heard it on the killing videos they circulate on Facebook.
There’s a lot of drug use in this building – strange shit. A lot of mental illness. Combine the two and you have an explosive situation. Right across the street at an upscale bar people come in late at night screaming full force saying the same thing over and over again. It’s scary. I don’t go out late at night.
One must wonder about the degree of drug addiction in people bringing their children into any country illegally, claiming they’re fleeing drug cartels. Do drug cartels burn villages? What would be the benefit?
I’m not seeing an issue about separating children from adults claiming to be parents. Prove it. So dad, uncle, granddad get an underage sex partner? So how are all these Spanish-speaking males sexually relieving themselves in these detention centers?
I don’t believe that no rapes have occurred. I don’t believe that diseases haven’t spread. Hepatitis, HIV? No? Can’t they get treated in their own countries? So they come to the USA?
For safety sake I would separate the people as they do in jails and prisons. They took the risk, knowing they were breaking the law. They were going to use their children to break the law, enter a country illegally and if not caught would force that child to live as a fugitive, always looking over their shoulders for their entire lives. What parent would subject their child to that? An unfit parent.
Cure them of their diseases, then send them back and build a secure border – yes with a wall. Once a criminal always a criminal. It’s the mindset of forever living outside the law and the effect that has on societies that should be worrisome.
You can’t bring a dog who hasn’t had a specified series of rabies shots into the state of Hawaii or unless they have an official identifying chip. But the democrats in the USA are saying to Spanish-speaking populations, bring us your drug resistant gonorrhea and any other diseases you have, and yes your horrific human rights violating cultural practices.
This is really about Spain and how backwards they are as a nation and a people. This country and the people in it still celebrate the slow taunting, torturing and killing of a bull in a public arena for pleasure.
Why hasn’t Spain weighed in on the floods of Spanish-speaking people trying to illegally enter the USA?
I think refugees from the Middle East should flood Spain. It’s only fair. Why should one country absorb so many? Fifteen million illegals, that’s not counting all the legals. They wouldn’t have to travel very far.
Gayle King on CBS morning show – your world in 90 seconds – apparently knows better than white people what these so-called white people think.
A focus group on race comprised of mostly blacks was asked a question: If a black couple goes into an empty restaurant and the host seats them at the back of the restaurant – presumably near the restrooms and kitchen – what does the black couple think? Blacks responded with indignation. The answer was of course they’d be offended. The restaurant is empty, why seat us here?
Now the next question was the same, except it’s a white couple in an empty restaurant seated by the host in the back presumably near the restrooms and kitchen. What do the white people think? The blacks jumped in not allowing any of the white people to express themselves. They answered oh, they’d think, look we’ve got the whole restaurant to ourselves. No indignation. Happy they were – the whites.
Later when the show returned to Gayle King and she summarized, she said she loved that part of the discussion – about black and white couples in the restaurant and how they perceive where they’re seated differently. Regarding the white people’s perception, that was given by black people, that they’d somehow think it was cool to be seated next to the restroom and kitchen, because they had the whole restaurant to themselves, Gale King said, “that is so true”.
No Gayle King, it is not true, and that just shows your ignorance and arrogance about what you claim to know about what white people think. They ask a question about blacks and whites and they have the blacks answer for themselves, and then answer for the whites too. The two white news anchors sitting with Gayle King: Norah O’Donnell and John Dickerson said essentially nothing.
I can guarantee you that if Norah or John were shown to the back of any empty restaurant and seated next to the restroom or kitchen they would be outraged and indignant. They would not think it was cool that they had the whole restaurant to themselves. Both white and black would have felt the same way. This did not demonstrate how blacks and whites think differently, when blacks answered for themselves plus answered for whites. All it showed was how blacks think and how blacks think whites think. And then that process was copied by the three stooges on the stage after the fact of the focus group. This is not a conversation or a discussion. It is blacks talking black. The whites were tokens in the group.
Usually, people with children get seated at the back of the restaurant, but even so, many times in the past Steve and I when alone were seated there, and no we didn’t like it and yes we made an inquiry. It seems we didn’t look rich enough, or maybe they just didn’t know us or maybe it was something else. But waiters instinctively know that most people don’t like bad seats. Waiters don’t like bad seats when they dine out. Hosts are the same.
Color blindness came up and I already made my views known a long time ago about that. I pay attention to all colors, shapes and sizes. Hues, nuances, shadows, the whole thing. I am not blind to gender, race or religion. I can see a disabled or handicapped person. I can see every species of every animal, every leaf, flower, cloud, star, it’s all there. I’m an artist. I take it all in. Even though you may think you’re special because of your color or some other self-proclaimed attribute of your culture, to me we’re all on the same canvas. I’m not going to purposely see your color or appreciate the culture that you claim goes along with that color just because you want special attention based on mostly prejudicial variables. Most people don’t care about color, it’s the way people act that matters.
One black guy says, yeah, because of our color they see us coming. He failed to say that because of white people’s color, black people see them coming. It works both ways.
See me. See me? One woman on that panel saw too many psoriasis medication commercials for sure. I was shocked actually to hear that she wanted all white people to see her for her color and her culture and appreciate both. Blindly, you mean, without even knowing you first? Now that’s a discriminatory expectation. Accept me as I want you to accept me based on my color and my culture? So not based on your individuality and who you are as a person? Because right now I’m seeing racist written all over your color and your culture. If your color makes you who you are, then you’re a bigot. If your culture, that never got described by any black in this group, defines you instead of you defining it, then you’re enslaved by your own people and their ways, whatever those mysterious ways are.
So blacks don’t want to be individuals. That’s why they always say ‘we’, when referring to something they want. That’s why they refer to white people as all thinking the same way, in unison, like they do. The color and the culture are one and all those falling under those same categories are one, not millions of individuals, but one color, one race, one group, one voice.
That’s troublesome and worrisome to this individual woman with the DNA heritage of about twenty different regions of the world. That I’m just a white woman who needs a black group and black culture to tell the world what I think, makes me wonder if that whole focus exercise and the plight of black lives terrorists is to change white-minded people into black-minded people, so blacks can rule the planet as one color, one culture.
So, were there any handicapped people in the group? No people with disabilities allowed to share their views? Restaurants hire people with disabilities. Maybe not the one featured, and maybe that should be an issue. But it’s common knowledge how blacks in general feel about those with handicaps, regardless of color or culture – they see them as weak and unworthy. That black ball player who took up two handicapped parking spaces so that his expensive car wouldn’t get scratched was disrespecting all people with physical challenges.
That is what should have made the news and been the focus, but blacks didn’t care anything about that, and neither did any of the news shows. All they saw was a privileged somebody disrespecting the handicapped get tasered. He’s lucky that’s all he got for keeping his hands in his pockets when the police said to remove them, thinking he may be armed and wanting to kill a police officer. After all he disrespected those who can’t fight for themselves. Now he wants to sue for millions of dollars so it doesn’t happen to anybody else.
What about the disrespect of the handicapped? Oh that stuff doesn’t matter. So with all his millions he would do the same again, so how is he changing behavior with all his money that needs more money to keep changing nothing?
Did he change his view about handicapped people? Does he now see that he is not superior to them or anyone else, just because he’s rich and has a fancy car and can throw a ball into a hoop? Is he going to buy some handicapped people motorized wheel chairs and automobiles to make up for his prejudice against them? Physically challenged people drive, that’s why they have parking spaces designated for them.
So this black-colored guy with a black culture who hates handicapped people, would run them over if they fell in the street if he thought they were in his way. And all the white people are supposed to appreciate the color associated with that culture? Is he going to give lectures to all his black people on the worthiness of those with physical challenges?
He’s raising money for black lives terrorist groups. It was set up. He saw an opportunity and took it. He wanted to get beaten up. That’s my view.
The focus group too. It was a set up. Each time the whites got a chance to speak they did it in disparaging tones toward themselves, and in apologetic, conciliatory, surrendering ‘we have to do better’ terms, putting all the onus on themselves for whatever complaints were being lodged against all white people, by a few black people in a made for T.V. focus group in the name of all black people and their culture.
They were all coached on what to say, and when. That’s how focus groups are designed. With this one, they made the white faces and white culture (whatever that means) guilty as charged by the blacks and black culture. They were tried, convicted and publicly humiliated. They were socially engineered into surrendering to all black people.
Black lives terrorists do it again – hijack a show about restaurant etiquette to make their demands public. Hey, the guy who owns the restaurant says that where he came from in the Middle East he was never exposed to race. Only in America was he exposed to race. He must be like black people say they are – they all think with one thought and one voice. Then why are blacks so aggressive and Muslims so unhappy if this one thought one group one voice works so well? Oh you can be sure that he saw and heard of lots of prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter where he came from. Why else would he be in the USA?
The purpose of this Black Lives terrorists charade? To make Gayle King happy? She was squirming in her seat happy.
As far as the black face wanting me to see black culture when I look at it. No thanks. I know who you are by your actions – individually. And I know that you act in unison with all people of your same color and culture, when you’re talking about people who are not your color nor of your culture. The color doesn’t interest me – though I do see through it – I don’t let other people paint my pictures nor my views for me. Neither should anybody else.
When you think too much about the color of your skin, you’re not thinking enough about your character.
We’re all different breeds of the same human animal, by the way.
Most of us are mixed breeds.
It’s best not to state or even imply your superiority over any other breed within your own species or any other species, or to state your superiority over those of any species who live with physical challenges. It’s just not the proper way to think or to act.
Being proper means being considerate, it doesn’t mean accepting blindly a color or breed based on an unknown culture.
Colors aren’t destroying the planet; the cultures are doing that. Clean up your bad cultural habits and color won’t matter. You choose to make your own color stand for what you want it to stand for. Don’t blame others for not wanting to be a part of it, when violence is how it begins, how it continues and how it ends.
CBS needs to clean up their ‘cure a prejudice with another prejudice’ act and to stop feeding white people to black people on T.V. It’s barbaric.
Much of the pain black people claim they feel is the result of being dependent on the group. That’s why you often hear them wanting to be king, queen, leader, ironically of the group.
Cut those cords. The group is responsible for holding you down, out and back.
Survival of the group identity, not your own personal identity, is the reason the leaders of the group corral you, herd you, enslave you as their’s to own, abuse, exploit. The goal of the group is to make you act in the best interests of the group, not in your best interest.
Groups do not think nor operate in terms of the interests of the group and the interests of the individual as being equal. There is no equality within the group. You’re all slaves. You are a tool, not a worthy independent person.
Free yourselves from your own and soar in your public and private life.
If you fear that independence, that is proof of your enslavement.
The making of a Royal. The Marriage.
There were no politicians among the 600 member guest list to witness the legal union of Prince Harry and Megan Markle in Great Britain on 19 may 2018.
Often cited in the American press in the run-up to the event was that President of the United States Donald Trump was purposely left off the guest list.
Well, that was partly correct, but as per usual the press often leaves out the actual facts around a particular headline designed to sell news.
What the American press omitted was that all politicians, elected officials of any sort, were also not invited.
Two high-profile politically motivated Black African figures representing the Nations of Africa did happen to sneak in however, under the guises of billionaire weight watcher, Oprah Winfrey and Chicago preacher, Michael Curry.
A Black Lives Matter Terrorist from Chicago, using biblical quotes and quotes of black civil rights leaders from the past, designed through a royal wedding sermon a call to arms through the power of fire and then a call to sacrifice one’s own blood for the greater good, to heal the past, so the power of love can be found.
Offering one’s life up as sacrifice, to shed one’s own blood and the blood of others for the purpose of liberating those oppressed, didn’t sound much to me like the power of love he kept referencing as his own blood trickled then gushed from a mind of a minister meister gone mad.
That was one speech of a sermon that did not belong at, nor was appropriate for, a wedding of any kind. Politically motivated and racially charged. A sting operation. That the Black Lives Terrorist preacher gone rogue was so unprofessional, acting through his speech pattern like he wasn’t educated, must tell you something about his honesty.
Using biblical quotes to justify the letting of blood – no matter whose blood – is never a good idea nor a compassionate solution to any problem.
All politicians are actors and all actors are politicians. The church was overflowing with them.
This was another instance of Black Lives Matter hijacking a public event – this time a royal wedding.
There’s no law that compels a married couple to relinquish their personal freedoms and privacy rights upon one of them or someone in their family running for public office or becoming a public servant.
Servant does not mean slave.
Why don’t we as a people demand the same scrutiny of those who spy and pry into the private relationships of famous people? I’ll bet you’ll find some pretty seedy, disgusting and questionable daliances among those who prey for profit on the human frailties and vulnerabilities of those who serve.
Equal time. It’s time to turn the gun on the predator. Put your ugly face out there so we can all see the definition of slime.
It goes with the territory – the spying and prying? That’s the law? We the People want to see dirt on the hands and faces of public servants? And the Jewish free press delegated themselves the position of feeding them to We the People?
I thought the Jews had their own country. What are they doing trampling on some other country’s privacy and freedom rights? A group of people without decency decide to cannibalize public servants in foreign countries? To humiliate them? Why? Because it feels good? Oh, I get it – because you’re perverts? and can’t help yourselves?
You mean you get paid to be a pervert by another big wig pervert? And so the chain goes up the command to the top perve? Show me a face…You didn’t get this from me. I’m tired of being a pervert for some other pervert who gets all the fame and money.
These ownership rights that these peeping perverts think they have over other people, don’t exist except in the minds of the ones spying and prying and the judges who allow certain individuals to be stalked and peeped on, humiliated and terrorized, as fodder for the perverted among us.
You don’t get to make up laws concerning the privacy rights and freedoms of certain individuals, calling it, ‘it goes with the territory. No it doesn’t just because you say so or because that’s what people have done in the past. It isn’t your right to take anybody’s privacy or freedoms away. No person willingly gives up those rights as a condition of service to one’s country.
All individuals need to be held to the same standards. It is prejudical and discriminatory to expect different behaviors from different groups of people – no matter the group. A bartender needs to be held to the same standards as the owner of the establishment, a governor, a president. All the same. All equally responsible for the same level of standards of decency.
We are not a fair and just society if we hold different people in different jobs or different statuses to different decency standards.
The world needs someone to love.
The world needs a mother.
Rest In Peace Barbara Bush.
Where does the FOURTH AMENDMENT stand on unreasonable search and seizure of a person’s private papers and effects? Where does it state, under what provision, amendment, article or law, that ‘we the people’ have privacy rights? When it’s only the government that can be held accountable for violating our privacy rights, then what’s to prevent large corporations or entities from doing it?
That the Central Intelligence Agency has openly stated that they are a part of Facebook conducting social experiments on Facebook members may qualify Facebook as a government institution. In a letter sent to members stating that nobody complained about their presence as justification for them to conduct said experiments and studies [on unsuspecting members] and to continue doing it, seems to me to misinterpret a lack of complaints as agreement with their policies, procedures and methods… Most people are afraid to challenge anything the CIA does – after all they have a long history of threatening people with torture, money loss, family destruction, career bombs and more for questioning their motives regarding anything they do. Like terrorists they are above the law. Next thing you know, your dog dies. Or you get beaten up by a man on a skateboard waiting for you outside your apartment complex.
FOURTH AMENDMENT: AN OVERVIEW
I. INTERESTS PROTECTED
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law.
To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant’s Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government.
In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect‘s imminent escape.
On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable.
However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment.
Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law.
FINISH READING: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fourth_amendment