Posted in POLITICS

Vegan Nation Interviews U.S. Presidential Candidates – The Humane Herald

Discover The Humane Party Presidential Primary candidates, Robert Mason (in Texas) and Clifton Roberts (in California).

Vegan Nation radio host Marlene Narrow will interview both candidates, on WCUW 91.3 FM, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.Tune in worldwide online on Thursday, October 24th, 2019, 4 pm – 5 pm, Eastern time.

See the event page on Facebook.

Hear archived shows and at the radio station index.Note: Humane Party Presidential Primary Elections October 1st – 25th….

INFO AND LINKS: Vegan Nation Interviews U.S. Presidential Candidates – The Humane Herald






Posted in NEWS OF INTEREST, POLITICS

“There’s Good News And Bad News. Which Do You Want To Hear First?”

Local Union 141.com ©

PART I

That’s what the doctor asked in a phone call not too long ago.

“Tell me the good news”, the optimist in me said.

“You’ve got two days to live” said the doctor.

“Jeeze, I said. “If that’s the good news, what’s the bad news?”

“I was supposed to tell you yesterday”, replied the doctor somewhat apologetically.

author of the joke unknown


THE GOOD NEWS is that starting October 1, 2019 most Jack Security Officers will see about a $2 an hour bump in their paychecks.

THE BAD NEWS is that it tops out in the 5th year @ $15.25 an hour. After 5 years you get a $500 bonus on your anniversay. And it’s a 5-year contract, which amounts to 25 cents per hour before taxes.


It COULD have been better!

It SHOULD have been better!

It WOULD have been better if we had a better union.

It…

View original post 1,387 more words

Posted in NEWS OF INTEREST, POLITICS

Rep. Omar filed joint tax returns before she married husband

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Minnesota campaign finance officials said last week that Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar misused campaign funds in violation of state rules. They also revealed that she had filed joint tax returns with her husband years before they were legally married and at a time when she was married to another man.

The revelation put the freshman representative under more scrutiny from critics who have taken issue with her marital past. One tax expert said that if there is no criminal intent and the issue has been corrected, she’s unlikely to face any criminal consequences.

Some questions and answers about the tax issue:

Q: What did Omar do wrong?

A: The Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board said Thursday that Omar and her husband, Ahmed Abdisalan Hirsi, filed joint tax returns for 2014 and 2015 — before they were actually married and while Omar was legally wed to another man. While some states allow for joint filing for “common law” marriages, Minnesota does not, and filing joint tax returns with someone who is not your legal spouse is against both federal and state law.

Q: How did this become public?

A: Last year, a Republican state representative accused Omar of misusing campaign funds, alleging among other things that she used $2,250 in campaign money to pay a lawyer for her divorce proceedings. The campaign finance board investigated and found she didn’t use the funds to pay for a divorce lawyer as alleged, but other irregularities were found. The board’s final report said “there was an issue with her tax returns that needed to be corrected” and that some campaign funds went to an accounting firm.

State officials ruled last week that Omar must repay her campaign committee nearly $3,500, including $1,500 for payments made to the accounting firm for services related to joint tax returns for 2014 and 2015. Omar must also pay a $500 penalty to the state.

Q: What has Omar said about this?

A: Very little. In response to questions from The Associated Press, her campaign sent an emailed statement saying, “All of Rep. Omar’s tax filings are fully compliant with all applicable tax law.” The campaign did not make Omar available for an interview or answer specific questions from the AP. In response to the overall campaign finance investigation, she said in a statement last week that she will comply with the state board findings calling for her to repay money and pay a penalty.

Q: Hasn’t Omar faced criticism on other issues?…

FINISH UP: Rep. Omar filed joint tax returns before she married husband






 

Posted in MEDIA, NEWS OF INTEREST, POLITICS

Full Transcript Of Mueller Statement On Russia Probe

MUELLER STATEMENT ON RUSSIA PROBE

Full Transcript of Mueller’s Statement on Russia Investigation

By The Associated Press


The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, made his first public comments about the Russia investigation.

Doug Mills/The New York Times

By The New York Times

May 29, 2019


 

Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, made his first public comments on Wednesday about the Russia investigation that he took over two years ago.

The following is a transcript of his remarks, as prepared by The New York Times.

_________________

ROBERT S. MUELLER III, the special counsel: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for being here. Two years ago, the acting attorney general asked me to serve as special counsel and he created the special counsel’s office. The appointment order directed the office to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. This included investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign.

Now, I have not spoken publicly during our investigation. I am speaking out today because our investigation is complete. The attorney general has made the report on our investigation largely public. We are formally closing the special counsel’s office, and as well, I’m resigning from the Department of Justice to return to private life. I’ll make a few remarks about the results of our work. But beyond these few remarks, it is important that the office’s written work speak for itself. Let me begin where the appointment order begins, and that is interference in the 2016 presidential election.

As alleged by the grand jury in an indictment, Russian intelligence officers who are part of the Russian military, launched a concerted attack on our political system. The indictment alleges that they used sophisticated cyber techniques to hack into computers and networks used by the Clinton campaign. They stole private information and then released that information through fake online identities and through the organization WikiLeaks.

The releases were designed and timed to interfere with our election and to damage a presidential candidate. And at the same time, as the grand jury alleged in a separate indictment, a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation, where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to influence an election. These indictments contain allegations, and we are not commenting on the guilt or the innocence of any specific defendant. Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

The indictments allege, and the other activities in our report describe, efforts to interfere in our political system. They needed to be investigated and understood. And that is among the reasons why the Department of Justice established our office. That is also a reason we investigated efforts to obstruct the investigation. The matters we investigated were of paramount importance. It was critical for us to obtain full and accurate information from every person we questioned. When a subject of an investigation obstructs that investigation or lies to investigators, it strikes at the core of their government’s effort to find the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable.

Let me say a word about the report. The report has two parts, addressing the two main issues we were asked to investigate. The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy. And in the second volume, the report describes the results and analysis of our obstruction of justice investigation involving the president.

The order appointing me special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation, and we kept the office of the acting attorney general apprised of the progress of our work. And as set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.

The introduction to the Volume II of our report explains that decision. It explains that under longstanding department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that, too, is prohibited. A special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice, and by regulation, it was bound by that department policy. Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider. The department’s written opinion explaining the policy makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation. Those points are summarized in our report, and I will describe two of them for you.

First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting president, because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.

And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing. And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge.

So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime. That is the office’s final position, and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the president. We conducted an independent criminal investigation and reported the results to the attorney general, as required by department regulations.

The attorney general then concluded that it was appropriate to provide our report to Congress and to the American people. At one point in time, I requested that certain portions of the report be released and the attorney general preferred to make — preferred to make the entire report public all at once and we appreciate that the attorney general made the report largely public. And I certainly do not question the attorney general’s good faith in that decision.

Now, I hope and expect this to be the only time that I will speak to you in this manner. I am making that decision myself. No one has told me whether I can or should testify or speak further about this matter. There has been discussion about an appearance before Congress. Any testimony from this office would not go beyond our report. It contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made. We chose those words carefully, and the work speaks for itself. And the report is my testimony. I would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before Congress. In addition, access to our underlying work product is being decided in a process that does not involve our office.

So beyond what I’ve said here today and what is contained in our written work, I do not believe it is appropriate for me to speak further about the investigation or to comment on the actions of the Justice Department or Congress. And it’s for that reason I will not be taking questions today, as well.

Now, before I step away, I want to thank the attorneys, the F.B.I. agents, the analysts, the professional staff who helped us conduct this investigation in a fair and independent manner. These individuals who spent nearly two years with the special counsel’s office were of the highest integrity. And I will close by reiterating the central allegation of our indictments, that there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election. And that allegation deserves the attention of every American. Thank you. Thank you for being here today.






Posted in NEWS OF INTEREST, POLITICS

Full Transcript of Mueller’s Statement on Russia Investigation

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, made his first public comments about the Russia investigation.

By The New York Times

  • The following is a transcript of his remarks, as prepared by The New York Times.

ROBERT S. MUELLER III, the special counsel: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for being here. Two years ago, the acting attorney general asked me to serve as special counsel and he created the special counsel’s office. The appointment order directed the office to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. This included investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign.

Now, I have not spoken publicly during our investigation. I am speaking out today because our investigation is complete. The attorney general has made the report on our investigation largely public. We are formally closing the special counsel’s office, and as well, I’m resigning from the Department of Justice to return to private life. I’ll make a few remarks about the results of our work. But beyond these few remarks, it is important that the office’s written work speak for itself. Let me begin where the appointment order begins, and that is interference in the 2016 presidential election.

As alleged by the grand jury in an indictment, Russian intelligence officers who are part of the Russian military, launched a concerted attack on our political system. The indictment alleges that they used sophisticated cybertechniques to hack into computers and networks used by the Clinton campaign. They stole private information and then released that information through fake online identities and through the organization WikiLeaks.

The releases were designed and timed to interfere with our election and to damage a presidential candidate. And at the same time, as the grand jury alleged in a separate indictment, a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation, where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to influence an election. These indictments contain allegations, and we are not commenting on the guilt or the innocence of any specific defendant. Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

The indictments allege, and the other activities in our report describe, efforts to interfere in our political system. They needed to be investigated and understood. And that is among the reasons why the Department of Justice established our office. That is also a reason we investigated efforts to obstruct the investigation. The matters we investigated were of paramount importance. It was critical for us to obtain full and accurate information from every person we questioned. When a subject of an investigation obstructs that investigation or lies to investigators, it strikes at the core of their government’s effort to find the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable.

Let me say a word about the report. The report has two parts, addressing the two main issues we were asked to investigate. The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy. And in the second volume, the report describes the results and analysis of our obstruction of justice investigation involving the president.

The order appointing me special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation, and we kept the office of the acting attorney general apprised of the progress of our work. And as set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.

The introduction to the Volume II of our report explains that decision. It explains that under longstanding department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that, too, is prohibited. A special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice, and by regulation, it was bound by that department policy. Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider. The department’s written opinion explaining the policy makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation. Those points are summarized in our report, and I will describe two of them for you.

First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting president, because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.

And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing. And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge.

So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime. That is the office’s final position, and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the president. We conducted an independent criminal investigation and reported the results to the attorney general, as required by department regulations.

The attorney general then concluded that it was appropriate to provide our report to Congress and to the American people. At one point in time, I requested that certain portions of the report be released and the attorney general preferred to make — preferred to make the entire report public all at once and we appreciate that the attorney general made the report largely public. And I certainly do not question the attorney general’s good faith in that decision.

Now, I hope and expect this to be the only time that I will speak to you in this manner. I am making that decision myself. No one has told me whether I can or should testify or speak further about this matter. There has been discussion about an appearance before Congress. Any testimony from this office would not go beyond our report. It contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made. We chose those words carefully, and the work speaks for itself. And the report is my testimony. I would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before Congress. In addition, access to our underlying work product is being decided in a process that does not involve our office.

So beyond what I’ve said here today and what is contained in our written work, I do not believe it is appropriate for me to speak further about the investigation or to comment on the actions of the Justice Department or Congress. And it’s for that reason I will not be taking questions today, as well.

Now, before I step away, I want to thank the attorneys, the F.B.I. agents, the analysts, the professional staff who helped us conduct this investigation in a fair and independent manner. These individuals who spent nearly two years with the special counsel’s office were of the highest integrity. And I will close by reiterating the central allegation of our indictments, that there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election. And that allegation deserves the attention of every American. Thank you. Thank you for being here today.






Posted in DONALD TRUMP, HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

Mossad Needs A History Lesson About Violating Freedoms Against USA Citizens

When Jews tell non-Jews that they need a history lesson, they’re not talking about books and classrooms; they’re talking about hauling you off for a holocaust treatment, never to be heard of again.

It makes me wonder how many missing persons around the globe were actually victims of the holocaust treatment?

After decades of hunting Nazis, when Jews talk about bringing only one Nazi to justice, to face criminal charges in an Israeli court, they want the world to know that all the other not-so-important supposed non-Jews were dealt with out of the public view.

These private death by torture operations were conducted with funds and resources provided by the USA government, at the USA taxpayer’s expense. Nazi Hunters they called themselves, operating with impunity wherever they went.

Members of Congress in the USA were fully aware that they were sanctioning and funding torture and assassination operations conducted by Israeli death squads within the USA and elsewhere.

People who want to lower the pain threshold of a nation by exploiting another nation for financial gain have sadistic and torture tendencies. I can see a lot of sadistic people in the democratic party grooming themselves for the highest office of the USA, preparing publicly for the inevitable private meetings with Israeli representatives.

That connection needs to end. The USA cannot continue to give comfort to the Jews for actions taken against them during World War II in Nazi-run factories in foreign countries, by allowing them to commit acts of torture and assassinations outside the law to avenge those conditions.

If Jews have evidence of war crimes against specific people then the international war crimes tribunal is the place to raise those concerns. Israel, however, has refused to participate in that court, so as to avoid charges by that court for war crimes they committed against specific Palestinians and against Palestinians as a group in the form of apartheid.

There needs to be a full scale investigation into the Mossad acting independently and without oversight on USA soil and the funds used to finance their decades-long actions of surveillance and operations plus the USA surveillance and law enforcement entities, agencies, bureaus and associations etc., etal that gave these Mossad members and their associates unfettered access without accountability to private USA citizens.

The sooner the better.

You just can’t keep killing everybody who doesn’t like you.

Maybe you’re giving them a reason.






 

Posted in HWH COMMENTARY, NEWS OF INTEREST, POLITICS, RACE | RELIGION

Mosque shooter a white nationalist seeking revenge

SYDNEY (AP) — The gunman behind at least one of the mosque shootings in New Zealand that left 49 people dead on Friday tried to make a few things clear in the manifesto he left behind: He is a 28-year-old Australian white nationalist who hates immigrants. He was set off by attacks in Europe that were perpetrated by Muslims. He wanted revenge, and he wanted to create fear.

He also, quite clearly, wanted attention.

Though he claimed not to covet fame, the gunman — whose name was not immediately released by police — left behind a 74-page document posted on social media under the name Brenton Tarrant in which he said he hoped to survive the attack to better spread his ideas in the media.

He also livestreamed to the world in graphic detail his assault on the worshippers at Christchurch’s Al Noor Mosque.

That rampage killed at least 41 people, while an attack on a second mosque in the city not long after killed several more. Police did not say whether the same person was responsible for both shootings.

While his manifesto and video were an obvious and contemptuous ploy for infamy, they do contain important clues for a public trying to understand why anyone would target dozens of innocent people who were simply spending an afternoon engaged in prayer.

There could be no more perplexing a setting for a mass slaughter than New Zealand, a nation so placid and so isolated from the mass shootings that plague the U.S. that even police officers rarely carry guns.Yet the gunman himself highlighted New Zealand’s remoteness as a reason he chose it. He wrote that an attack in New Zealand would show that no place on earth was safe and that even a country as far away as New Zealand is subject to mass immigration.He said he grew up in a working-class Australian family, had a typical childhood and was a poor student. A woman who said she was a colleague of his when he worked as a personal trainer in the Australian city of Grafton said she was shocked by the allegations against him.

“I can’t … believe that somebody I’ve probably had daily dealings with and had shared conversations and interacted with would be able of something to this extreme,” Tracey Gray told the Australian Broadcasting Corp.

Beyond his white nationalistic ideals, he also considers himself an environmentalist and a fascist who believes China is the nation that most aligns with his political and social values. He has contempt for the wealthiest 1 percent. And he singled out American conservative commentator Candace Owens as the person who had influenced him the most.In a tweet, Owens responded by saying that if the media portrayed her as the inspiration for the attack, it had better hire lawyers.

Throughout the manifesto, the theme he returns to most often is conflict between people of European descent and Muslims, often framing it in terms of the Crusades.

He wrote that the episode that pushed him toward violence took place in 2017 while he was touring through Western Europe. That was when an Uzbek man drove a truck into a crowd of people in Stockholm, killing five. The Australian was particularly enraged by the death of an 11-year-old Swedish girl in the attack.

He said his desire for violence grew when he arrived in France, where he became enraged by the sight of immigrants in the cities and towns he visited.

And so he began to plot his attack. Three months ago, he started planning to target Christchurch. He claimed not to be a direct member of any organization or group, though he said he has donated to many nationalist groups. He also claimed he contacted an anti-immigration group called the reborn Knights Templar and got the blessing of Anders Breivik for the attack.

Breivik is a right-wing Norwegian extremist who killed 77 people in Oslo and a nearby island in 2011. Breivik’s lawyer Oeystein Storrvik told Norway’s VG newspaper that his client, who is in prison, has “very limited contacts with the surrounding world, so it seems very unlikely that he has had contact” with the New Zealand gunman.

The gunman had a long wish list for what he hoped the attack would achieve. He hoped it would reduce immigration by intimidating immigrants. He hoped to drive a wedge between NATO and the Turkish people. He hoped to further polarize and destabilize the West. And he hoped to create more conflict over gun laws in the U.S., thus leading to a civil war that would ultimately result in a separation of races.

Though he claimed not to be a Nazi, in the video he livestreamed of the shooting the number 14 is seen on his rifle. That may be a reference to the “14 Words,” a white supremacist slogan attributed in part to Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf,” according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. He also used the symbol of the Schwarze Sonne, or black sun, which “has become synonymous with myriad far-right groups who traffic in neo-Nazi,” according to the center.

His victims, he wrote, were chosen because he saw them as invaders who would replace the white race. He predicted he would feel no remorse for their deaths. And in the video he livestreamed of his shooting, no remorse can be seen or heard. Instead, he simply says: “Let’s get this party started.”

Then he picks up his gun, storms into the mosque, and cuts down one innocent life after another.

When it is over, he climbs back into his car, where he has left his music playing — the song “Fire” by the English rock band The Crazy World of Arthur Brown. And right after the singer bellows, “I am the god of hellfire!” the gunman drives away.

Source: Mosque shooter a white nationalist seeking revenge – Associated Press


HWH Comment: How about instead of a news outlet telling us what he wrote and what it meant, let the public see what he wrote, and let each individual use their own brains to figure out what he meant. This article so far seems to be more about Jews wanting him to be a Nazi. If you’re not sure, then don’t put it out there.

I’ll be back to this with more information.





 

Posted in NEWS OF INTEREST, PALESTINE, POLITICS

Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East? Netanyahu’s comments have shattered that illusion 

…Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East?

Netanyahu’s comments have shattered that illusion.

His comments that the country belongs to ‘Jewish people alone’ strike to the heart of the nature of Israel.

Ben White The Independent Voices

Netanyahu is desperate, in the face of an electoral challenge from former military chiefs of staff as well as the looming indictments for corruption allegations ( EPA )

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu was back in the headlines on Sunday, after declaring on social media that “Israel is not a state of all its citizens”. The Likud leader later doubled down, telling his cabinet that Israel is “the nation state not of all its citizens, but only of the Jewish people”.

Netanyahu’s comments are the latest grim episode in an election season that will see Israelis going to the polls on 9 April. Just last month, the prime minister helped engineer an election merger that could see far-right party Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power) enter the Knesset.

That latter piece of realpolitik in particular prompted outrage from a number of Israeli politicians, analysts and even US-based groups better known for their Israel advocacy. According to the critics, Netanyahu’s boosting of the far-right and indulging of racist rhetoric endangers Israeli democracy.

Netanyahu is desperate, in the face of an electoral challenge from former military chiefs of staff as well as the looming indictments for corruption allegations. But recent developments are not just about motivating a right-wing base – the problem goes much deeper than an embattled demagogue.Netanyahu’s election manoeuvres offer an opportunity to shine a spotlight on an uncomfortable truth: namely that only under the most superficial definition can Israel be considered a democracy.

Consider the following:

Millions of Palestinians are subjected to a military regime which, for 52 years, has facilitated the establishment of illegal settlements. Settlers are Israeli citizens, and vote. The Palestinians they live among – whose land the settlers inhabit and colonise – are not.

The April elections will lead to the formation of Israel’s 35th government. Israel’s military occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip began during Israel’s 13th government.

Those Palestinians who do have Israeli citizenship, meanwhile, are very much second-class citizens – as Netanyahu has been at pains to emphasize.

Yes, the Jewish Nation-State law passed last year is significant in that regard, defining Israel as “the national home of the Jewish people”, and asserting that “the right to exercise national self-determination in the state of Israel is unique to the Jewish people”.

But the legislation was consistent with de jure and de facto discrimination going back to the very foundation of the state of Israel.As conflict studies scholar Nadim Rouhana wrote in 2010, “there are few honest observers in Israel who dispute that a Jewish state, by definition, privileges one group of citizens over another”.

This is an inequality “expressed in various ways, including in Israel’s Basic Laws and its laws of land control, immigration and resource distribution” – as documented by Palestinian citizens themselves, as well as international NGOs and human rights experts.

Finally – and this is regrettably rarely taken into account – there are millions of Palestinians who, expelled from their homes in the 1948 Nakba and prevented from returning ever since, are denied their rightful citizenship and thus suffrage…

FINISH READING: Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East? Netanyahu’s comments have shattered that illusion | The Independent






 

Posted in HWH COMMENTARY, NEWS OF INTEREST, POLITICS, RACE | RELIGION

Don Lemon doubles down after calling white men ‘biggest terror threat’ in U.S. – The Washington Post

HWH COMMENTARY: This segment is a perfect example of how CNN and black Africans explain Don Lemon’s racism against white people. “It’s true”, is their defense.


Well, it’s also true that some black Africans exhibit ape/monkey motor behavior. When walking, talking, singing they bend over and sway their arms back and forth and raise one arm at a time to their chests. The guy who sang at the Super Bowl halftime show did it – a lot. It’s not racist to point that out. It’s interesting. Drunk black Africans do it even more. It’s a little weird walking into a predominately black African drinking place to see the movement all around you, if you’re not used to it. They pound the bar a lot too, for attention. Males do it more often than females.

Whites also mimic blacks who do it, especially in the entertainment world. Even some women, especially Hispanic. They’re bringing their crotches into the songs or the talk. They spread their legs like monkeys do and start shaking their stuff with their hands.

We have senses for the purpose of observation – for recognition purposes. For example, reading is an observation exercise. Read this book with your eyes, then remove the book and we’re going to test what you read. Color the dot within the circle – another observational exercise.

If you don’t want me to observe that you dyed your hair blonde, then why do it? People pretty much walk, talk, move, dress, act to leave impressions in the minds of those who observe them – or to influence positively or negatively or anywhere in-between those they encounter in person, through the media, through gossip even.

If you don’t want me to look at your bare breasts, then why bare them? That’s the point – to rattle you, to shock you, to peak your interest, to distract you.

If you don’t want me to look at your bare ass, when you’re walking in front of me, then pull your pants up so I don’t have to look. Oh well, ‘you don’t have to look’, but everybody knows that people look at what is uncommon. Or what is sensual or sexual or grotesque or beautiful.

Powers of observation – very important to remember. It’s part of being an animal. We survive and thrive based on our observational skills. No justice no peace means war if black Africans aren’t allowed revenge when a police officer shoots a black person pretending to have a gun. Burning cities, businesses means war. War means death to white people.

War chants are terror tactics black Africans in America use to oppress white people – the white guy – as Don Lemon and Barak Obama famously refer to them. The Don Lemons and Barak Obamas of the world group all whites together. Or all men. Well, all white men are not the same. Oh, far right, extremist white men. Not many of those around blowing up towers. But they’re keeping Border People approaching the border from illegally crossing. Not that I’ve seen. Thousands of people got tuckered out Lemon says, so didn’t even try to cross? They didn’t walk the thousands of miles that Lemon claimed they did. They were driven. They only walked when the cameras were on or when stopping for breakfast, lunch, dinner and for the night – to sleep.

Don Lemon who was giving his own biased belief, was probably drunk when he said it, then CNN had to scramble to keep him on the show. The guy’s a train wreck.

Antifa (People against Fascism aka proanarchism) are mostly rich white non-observant Jews’ kids. Not many people with pick-up trucks in that crowd, who break protest laws, cover their faces with hoods, carry large burning torches, flame throwers. Toss police cruisers. Terrorize a nation in support of black Africans who break laws. They’re about as left-leaning as you get. They incite mob behavior and anybody watching the behavior – it’s all over the television. “A good cop is a dead cop”.

Maybe those white cops shouldn’t go out next time there’s a domestic violence call coming from the home of a rich and famous black person who paints all white people with the same brush. Transparent paint is what they use, because whites don’t have a color according to people of color. That tells the story right there.

Black Africans in America strip all white people of their color as a strategy to remove their power by removing their skin, after they take their souls, their hearts and now their observational senses. The purpose is to turn the white people black – or kill them, whichever benefits them the most.


It was true that recent gun violence could be attributed to white males, but their political or religious affiliation didn’t cause the strikes. They were popped. Probably by the media – that’s the source of most popping these days.

Don Lemon says things that even silly white people wouldn’t say. I’m not really sure where he gets his commentary. I do know that had a white commentator said that about blacks in America they would have been fired, even though most gun violence is perpetrated by blacks and many blacks have murdered many white police officers. You have to be careful when accusing white people that you get the correct group. Not all white people are the same.

Jews want to be considered a race, so many of those so-called white people were actually white Jews.

“…WHITE OFFICERS ARE NO MORE LIKELY TO USE LETHAL FORCE AGAINST MINORITIES THAN NONWHITE OFFICERS.”

Researchers looked at every use of deadly force by officers across the United States and discovered that the killing of black suspects is a police problem, not a white police problem. Further, the killing of unarmed suspects of any race is extremely rare. (https://www.futurity.org/police-killings-african-americans-1836722/)

Look at the OFFICER DOWN MEMORIAL PAGE and see how many officers paid the ultimate-life-price for serving the public. (https://www.odmp.org/search/year?year=2017)


The main topic of the show in question was not “WHO POSES THE GREATEST TERROR THREAT IN AMERICA TODAY?” Don Lemon morphed it into the only topic that everybody was talking about the next day.

There are shootings all over the USA everyday. Yet, he picked this one supermarket killing by a white male to point out to the world that the greatest threat to America today is white men. That was prejudicial, since he has no proof of the future threat. His anti-white republican guy feelings were hanging out all over the world stage.

The reason why white people get fired and metaphorically dismembered before the world and black people don’t for engaging in the same behavior is because white people don’t fight back; they’re not going to burn cities and terrorize a nation over it. So the intelligence agencies make a decision to feed a few high profile white people to the blacks to chew up as an appeasement tool. The CIA knows that white people will take the unequal, unfair punishment, just because they’re built that way.

Tables can, and as history has proven, turn. The white guys, as the black racists like to call them, will fight back and those white guys who fed the blacks their white meat dinners will be first on the menu.

Violence isn’t the white person’s first line of defense like it is with black people. Generally speaking.

White people don’t identify with their color. There’s no such thing as a white group of brothers and sisters that compares with a black group, even though worldwide whites are a minority race. Even the neo-Nazis aren’t on anybody’s ‘hang out with’ list, except other neo-Nazis. Nobody hangs with Jews, because Jews don’t hang with anybody else. They’re white separatists – in the USA and other English speaking nations. In non-English speaking nations their identity changes. Everywhere Jews populated, you’ll find them.

White people identify with their socio-economic class only to the extent that they share a demographic and frequent the same shops and engage in similar activities. Most white people don’t belong to clubs that focus on their race. There’s no running to a white person or leader or group if a white person has been wronged by a person of a different race. Whites don’t have leaders who tell them what to think, say and do.

Don Lemon said we shouldn’t demonize people, then went right into demonizing white men. Who did he mean by “we”? I guess in his Book of Racial Teachings white men aren’t people.

Don Lemon is a RACE BAITER AND RACIAL INCITER.







By Lindsey Bever November 1, 2018

During a recent segment about a supermarket shooting in Kentucky, CNN host Don Lemon said that “the biggest terror threat in this country is white men.”Lemon was speaking on live television Monday about an incident in which a white man allegedly shot and killed two black people outside a Kroger grocery store in Jeffersontown, Ky., not far from Louisville.

The incident, which is being investigated as a hate crime, occurred during the same week that 13 potential explosive devices were sent to prominent Democratic and media figures across the country and 11 people were killed in a mass shooting at a synagogue in Pittsburgh. A white man was charged in the latter case.

“I keep trying to point out to people not to demonize any one group or any one ethnicity. But we keep thinking that the biggest terror threat is something else — some people who are marching towards the border like it’s imminent,” Lemon told CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, referring to the Central American migrant caravan walking toward the United States. He added that “the last time they did this, a couple hundred people came and they — most of them didn’t get into the country. Most of them got tuckered out before they even made it to the border.”

“So,” he said, “we have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them. There is no travel ban on them. There is no ban — you know, they had the Muslim ban. There is no white-guy ban. So what do we do about that?”

On Wednesday, following the backlash, Lemon doubled down.

“Earlier this week, I made some comments about that in a conversation with Chris,” he said during a broadcast Wednesday night. “I said that the biggest terror threat in this country comes from radicals on the far right, primarily white men. That angered some people. But let’s put emotion aside and look at the cold hard facts. The evidence is overwhelming.”

Lemon pointed to a recent Government Accountability Office report that shows that since the 9/11 attacks in 2001, far-right violent extremists have killed 106 people in 62 attacks in the United States, while radical Islamist violent extremists have killed 119 people in 23 attacks.

He also referenced several studies, including a 2017 report from the Nation Institute’s Investigative Fund and the Center for Investigative Reporting’s Reveal, which found that from 2008 to 2016, there were almost twice as many terrorist incidents carried out on U.S. soil by right-wing extremists — many of whom are white — than by Islamist extremists.

It showed there were 115 incidents involving right-wing extremists and that those that ended in death were more deadly than incidents carried out by other groups.

“So people who were angered about what I said are missing the entire point,” Lemon said about his earlier statements. “We don’t need to worry about people who are thousands of miles away. The biggest threats are homegrown. The facts prove that.”

Source: Don Lemon doubles down after calling white men ‘biggest terror threat’ in U.S. – The Washington Post



HWH: In reference to terrorism Don Lemon said, “we don’t need to worry about people who are thousands of miles away”.

I guess he slept through 9-11. Or maybe he drank and drugged his way through it. Either way he doesn’t remember that the terrorists who struck the USA on 9-11 all lived thousands of miles away.

Don lemon is an embarrassment to the country and CNN news outlet. How could a news commentator not know that?





 

Posted in ANIMAL RIGHTS, HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

Black Lives Matter Terrorists Stage Another Black Face Hit

Get over yourselves. You have black faces, accept it, nobody cares.

If anybody wants to paint their white face black it’s not your business. You’re not hurt by it; you’re cashing in on it by screaming something hurts when it doesn’t. Anybody who gets their feelings hurt as much as you do is thinking too much about themselves.

Try showing some compassion to all those white people you brow beat as your daily religious ritual.

You’re a bunch of wimps, crying over somebody who wants to look like you.

I’ll cork my face black if I want to.

You’re all a bunch of hustlers, beating up on the descendants of white people who set you free. They didn’t ask for slaves. They worked their own fields.

Nobody mimics people they hate.

Maybe you all should stop trying to look like white people. Dying your hair blonde, stealing our fashions – out the back door usually.

Pay for your own white people swag. You don’t get a cut.

Make your own money.

You’re all making the world sick. It’s time to retire that aversion therapy strategy. It worked in reverse. The world developed an aversion to you, not themselves.

Ruining people’s careers because the color of their make-up offends you is a hate crime. Yeah, in my court of public opinion it’s a hate crime. That’s a lot of money you wipe out of an entire family’s bank account when you scare their employer with threats of violence if they don’t fire your target. That’s the work of a terrorist group. Instill fear to make people do what you want.

Black Face. What a joke. Hijack the news media to get the attention you crave?

Why not try doing something good for all humans, instead of just yourselves? Why make the news about you making others suffer on your behalf? That is sick.

Why not stop eating other animals whom you have other people torture and slaughter for you? What did you do to their gentle, peaceful faces? Ripped them from their bloody bodies is what you did. Then you fuckin’ ate them. You’ve got some answering to do.

I think it’s best that you stay away from other people’s faces and let them be or act the color they choose, not the color you choose for them.

That’s a terrorist maneuver when you tell people how they should look and not look.





 

Posted in DONALD TRUMP, HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

IN A State Of Urgency

I wonder why I don’t see any Black Africans living in the USA trying to eliminate slavery from the planet – as a cause.

All I see are Black Africans demanding money from white people, claiming they’re part of the slave legacy, like a forever pension fund for blacks, paid for by whites.

Slavery in the USA ended in 1863 – over 150 years ago.

Exploiting the past by scamming ‘white people in the present’ and the future for something they had no part in, even though it was legal at the time, speaks only to their own prejudice, discrimination and financial enslavement of white people, who again weren’t even alive back when slavery was popular around the globe.

Slavery still exists in Africa today and the sex slave trade is booming around the globe, with Blacks and Hispanics contributing to the degradation of the neighborhoods and nations. Black and Hispanic pimps proliferated like a weaponized disease all over the USA.That’s slavery.

Having happened to the people they call their brothers and sisters, one might think that to end slavery would be at the top of their list of social goals and responsibilities, given that they are free and the ones they continue to enslave for profit are not. They always say the same thing, ‘When we do it, it’s different’. They benefit from white people paying to screw black people. So, they enslave their own. It’s easy money. Hispanics benefit from white people taking their drugs; it’s easy money.

It’s out of sight out of mind, for the rest of them, who only care about the next hustle.

I wonder what PART Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer played over the years via laws passed through congress to benefit one or two groups over everybody else – in that forever debt scheme based on wrongful accusations of morally corrupt slave practices from 156 years ago?

In a legal court of law one cannot hold someone responsible for a crime they didn’t commit, or an injustice that was legal that they didn’t commit. So who put it into the heads of an entire race of people that they could count on a forever financial pension from all the white people born since slavery was abolished?

You might think that segment of the black race that lives in America would have been happy that slavery ended, but they overwhelmingly act pissed off over it.

Italians and Jews have a long history of hating black people, so here are two leaders in congress who control the purse strings – one Italian and one Jew – telling black people not to worry, white people will continue to foot the bill for however long it takes to make them happy – even though none of these people today were slaves. Hey, I heard slave stories too, but I never thought to demand cash from present-day people for something people I never met did hundreds of years ago.

Talk about audacity. That’s audacious – and proof of the forever Nigerian/Niger scam that flourishes wherever black Africans populate.

Maybe white people should start demanding payback money from all blacks who refuse to take care of themselves or their children at the world’s expense. Maybe white people will start getting revenge for all the black on white crimes committed – 156 years worth.

Spanish people want the government to take care of them too, so they don’t have that responsibility. Everybody wants to be King or President of the United States, who can’t tie their own shoes or speak English. Actually, they’d rather game the system than become part of it.

They don’t want your pity; they want your money. They use the pity strategy before the gun strategy to open the door to your vault, hoping they won’t have to use the gun. It’s a pity scheme. Along with the desire for someone else’s property comes corruption – followed by enslavement, torture and slaughter.

So two mindless, scared little shits in congress, one elderly female with a Mussolini tic acting like a Mafia crime boss and one elderly male who bows six times to Tel-Aviv everyday decided to make amends for all Italians and all Jews worldwide who ever offended a black African in the USA – off the backs of lower and lower-middle class people. For feuds going back hundreds of years. Yes, we have a caste system in the USA.

Without the Black and Hispanic vote the democratic party dissolves into thin air.

Who’s your Daddy now?

Blacks and Hispanics have a lot of Daddys. They suffer from parent-confusion. Raised by grandparents, they grow up in a previous generation that doesn’t exist any more except in somebody else’s memory bank.

Yeah, the mafia boss, and the Israeli loyalist who consistently betrays the trust of those he is supposed to serve under the laws of the USA Constitution who were in congress on 9-11 forgot the lessons learned from sleeping on the job. What’s in that coffee you’re drinking?

Schumer and Pelosi manufactured a huge distraction by trying to convince the American people they were hostages for wanting a secure border, which does not now exist and hasn’t existed for a long time, allowing untold and undocumented terrorists into the country – to whose benefit?

Pelosi and Schumer act like terrorists are fictional characters in fairy tale books and bed time stories read to children to scare them to sleep.

WAKE UP in today’s world. Get out of your neighbor’s backyard. I’m not going to tell you again.






 

Posted in HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

What Happened To The American Dream?

Affirmative Action is killing the American Dream.

Now the world dreams of living in a welfare state – the USA.

Members of the USA congress gave the American Dream away – to citizens of other countries south of the border (SOTB).






 

Posted in FACEBOOK, MEDIA, POLITICS

Mossad On Facebook?

Mossad operatives on social media defending the south of the border immigrants’ right to return to what they claim to be their original land – the USA.

That’s bold – considering how they feel about the Palestinian’s right to return to the land Israelis stole from them. Guess they deem them trouble makers whom they’d like off their newfound land of milk and honey.

I say let Mossad deal with trouble makers so the USA doesn’t have to.






 

Posted in DONALD TRUMP, MEDIA, POLITICS

Kamikaze Maneuvers On the Rise

President Trump isn’t doing enough about white supremacists, says CNN cable opinion news broadcasters.

That’s because the Jews burnt their own temples and the Africans their own villages. So yeah, be on the alert for Kamikaze maneuvers to gain political capital.

Come on this is a no brainer.

Stop looking for consensus before you even get the problem before you.

Groups killing their own and blaming somebody else to get world attention on their issues is making a comeback.






 

Posted in DONALD TRUMP, HWH COMMENTARY, NEWS OF INTEREST, POLITICS

NON-CITIZEN HISPANICS DEFRAUD IRS paid to look the other way?

HWH Commentary: This is shocking if it’s true. No wonder Border People are desperate to be here. The streets really are paved with Gold. But guess who’s paying for the fraud? Yep, the hard-working American living from pay check to pay check. Prices rise on everything, social services go to Hispanics first, then blacks, then white, then Chinese. It’s a discriminatory system. First to apply should be the rule. But social workers and office staff notoriously change dates and alter applications.

My identification was stolen a few years ago and the IRS and Social Security treated me as if I were the criminal. They never would tell me who stole it. They put me through hoops that were all unnecessary.

It’s not a few bad apples. Everyone comes to the USA with a scam in mind. The country is already built. They’re not coming here to build anything but their own bank accounts off the backs of those who work the hardest for the least amount.

It’s the few good ones that we base all our immigration polices on. That’s what gets us into immigration trouble, where we end up with fifteen million (and increasing rapidly) people living in the USA illegally at the tax payers expense.

Don’t let those crocodile tears fool you. They bear children for the purpose of exploiting them, like the Chinese bear them for the purpose of switching kids with their neighbors so they won’t feel guilty eating them.

Animal rights activists wonder why the Chinese and all Oriental Asian Peoples are so emotionally distant from the suffering they or others inflict upon other animals.

Hey, they did it to their own children. They turned the conscience switch off for what they called  necessary for survival. How long can a kid last? Depends on the size. Why do you think they put so little meat into their dishes and they cut it up so small? So it’ll last, and so they won’t recognize any feature that resembles who they are. These weren’t cows. But even cows are put into meat grinders so they won’t be recognized as the farmer’s child’s pet, when she eats it.

Asians don’t have cemeteries. They eat their dead. Their stomachs are final resting places.

Indians float their dying families on rafts out in the middle of a body of water without an anchor to finish dying, where only vultures and water animals can eat them, or neighboring tribes up or down stream. Probably some kind of peace offering to the Gods of the animals (including humans) they hunt. They don’t have cemeteries either. All this talk about ancient burial grounds is nonsense.

Where are the Mexican graveyards in USA? Probably in your stomach.

It seems all they’re allowed to do is open Mexican restaurants and employ the whole tribe. Ever hear of a white family opening a Mexican restaurant or Chinese restaurant or Greek or Jewish? That’s discrimination. They only give permits to certain ethnicities to operate certain ethnic restaurants.

I know, I know, they do other work jobs too.

But why only Indians and Pakistanis can own convenience stores? And why does the IRS let them charge beer and wine as grocery? Isn’t that discrimination?

Okay, okay mostly Indians and Pakistanis. It’s like the government decides what immigrants are going to do before they even get here. Or is it the other way around? Why do most immigrants when they get here want to start a small business instead of learn a skill to do something else? Probably because they can employ the whole family who doesn’t speak English. When I grew up there wasn’t anyone I knew who wanted to be a store owner. What would they sell?

Now, every immigrant comes with a dream of hanging out a shingle and selling something. America has too many sellers and not enough buyers as a result.

In Cleveland there’s a restaurant downtown that applied for a permit to serve dog meat on the menu. Word has it that they were denied, but since they’re upscale and entertain out-of-towners and probably visiting foreigners, they know the people to go to for fresh dog meat. They all have back rooms and secrets in the kitchen and after hour parties.

Japanese people (alright, some Japanese people) cook dogs alive by paralyzing them first. They cook them slowly. It’s a sick world we live in. Hey, the Japanese don’t do it as a necessity to survive. They turn that conscience switch off too. Rural people do it. They keep the head of the chicken sticking out of the pot, with the rest of the body of the live chicken bound by the pot so it can’t move while being cooked, then they slowly cook it to death.

“I cooked it to death”.  Where do you think that saying comes from? The slow cooking process too – makes the animal more tender.

Hispanics have been scamming people in the USA forever (for as long as most people can remember and before that). It’s how they operate. Mostly? NO, not with this one.

It’s time to bust that operation wide open. Is it so strange that out of all the departments in the government they’d pick the IRS to scam? I mean those IRS people are diligent. They’re ruthless. So how does this go on this long? DRUG MONEY (CARTEL INSURANCE POLICY). They get paid off. Just like south-of-the-border. Drug money is everywhere. Money talks and walks. It’s the most versatile commodity.

Where do the drug lords in the USA do their banking? Come on, they do it somewhere. Where do they launder it? You don’t know and you don’t care, that’s why so many people want to ice ICE and the FBI? If there’s no one to investigate them, they can operate with impunity. Law enforcement is okay with them, because they can more easily own them. Sometimes even they need a cop. They have families; their security force can’t be all places with all family members all the time.

Yeah, all these people who publicly state to eliminate the FBI and ICE have been bought or want to be bought and their public declaration is their first knock on the cartels door.

I WANT YOU.

Time to close that shop down.






Posted in HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

CHINA’S Factories

CHINA doesn’t need our factories anymore; they can build and maintain their own. All they need is a market.

We need to get out and let them be self-sufficient. Not to would be exploitive on our part.

~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight






 

Posted in BORDERS | BOUNDARIES, DONALD TRUMP, HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

PREYING ON PEOPLE’S VULNERABILITIES FOR PROFIT OR POWER

Massive numbers of people (or one person) forcing themselves onto another country without consent = RAPE of that country.

Spanish speaking peoples SOTB prey on people’s vulnerabilities for profit, forcing those vulnerable to NEED them.

HOW DO THEY DO THAT and get away with it?

DECEIT. Everything in their lives, everything they do is a product of deceit. They lie about everything. It becomes reflexive when you live and work underground.

Border People have been kissing up to RICH PEOPLE of the USA for decades, demanding to be their slaves, begging them to work for pennies on the dollar (just provide for us; we don’t need nor want much, and we have women too, we’ll take care of your kids, you don’t have to declare us or pay taxes on us), flipping the Slave Bird at the Blacks who wanted to be free. And now they’re staging a coup to take down the KING who refused their offer. I’ll tell ya somethin, if there’s one BIG mean BIRD who you’re gonna have a tough time taking down, it’s that one.

You should hear these Chippers all over Facebook trying to recruit people to join their coup attempt. Wow. President Donald J. Trump said no to the slave offer.

So all those rich asses you kissed all those decades aren’t coming through for you. Even though they know you’ve got stuff on them – MONITORING them, as you call it, in their own mansions, all the while pretending you didn’t speak English. Do those tapes even still play? I mean can you actually find a device that plays those antiquated tape recordings?

They thought it was a slam dunk, a walk in the park, a shoot yourself in the foot moment that miraculously heals itself, no evidence no proof. And then he came along and everybody forced a conscience onto him.

What? what? Mr. President, remember us. Us? The slaves. We’re your slaves. All kings need slaves. We’re your happy slaves. You know, like the vegans have happy cows.

We want you to succeed. But with us. We put you here. We just pretended that we didn’t. That’s how we are. Thought you knew it man. Okay, okay. The wall is okay, as long as you put a side door into it. Wink, wink. You know us; we know you know us. Don’t pay any attention to what that old woman says. She’s nobody. We hate her. She’s so poor. It’s laughable.

IS IT ANY WONDER that all the rich people on television, in politics, in business are jumping out of their trees in support of a Wall War? Take the focus off of us and what we did and put it on an inanimate object. THE WALL WAR OF 2019.

Man, all those wannabe slaves ruined it for everybody who didn’t wanna be a slave. How do you talk human rights, freedom rights when a whole new breed of people SOTB comes along and wants to be enslaved? Talk about exploiting rich people’s vulnerabilities. Sure, everybody likes free stuff. But notice that these slaves didn’t work for non-rich people who could probably have afforded them. No, no. They went where the big money was. It was part of the LONG DISTANCE COUP PLAN.

Most coups are internal. They knew that. But they had no power SOTB, so go north of the border (NOTB) and attach themselves to rich people. That’s where the main financial energy grid lies.

Politics is a long game.

A coup appears on the surface to be quick. Yes. The element of surprise is everything – for a coup to succeed.

It’s the planning that takes a long time.

Can one person stop a coup?

It depends what language you speak.






 

Posted in ANIMAL RIGHTS, HWH COMMENTARY, NEWS OF INTEREST, POLITICS

Beef-friendly Nebraska eyes regulations on the word ‘meat’

HWH Comment: The word ‘meat’ does not clearly come from livestock as Sen. Carol Blood claims. Meat has historically been used to refer to many types of plant food. Sen. Carol Blood should focus on turning Nebraska’s animal slaughter industries into plant meat industries or technology or anything other than continuing selling for consumption the atrocities committed against cattle and all other ‘destined for our plate’ animals. She lacks vision, hope, ingenuity and a better plan for the future of Nebraska. I’d say Nebraska needs a better advocate than one who advocates holding onto an industry that’s doomed.

There is no truth in advertising cattle as livestock. They’re deadstock. There is no truth to the claim that animals are on this earth as a food for human consumption. Animals are not food, except in the deviant minds of those who thirst for the blood and flesh of other creatures. Or by those who raise and sell victims of torture and slaughter for profit.



LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — More than four months after Missouri became the first U.S. state to regulate the term “meat” on product labels, Nebraska’s powerful farm groups are pushing for similar protection from veggie burgers, tofu dogs and other items that look and taste like real meat.

Nebraska lawmakers will consider a bill this year to prevent companies that package and sell food from advertising plant-based, insect-based and lab-grown products as meat. Similar measures are pending in Tennessee, Virginia and Wyoming.

The issue strikes a particularly strong chord in Nebraska, one of the nation’s top states for livestock production, where cars roll down the interstate with “Beef State” license plates and the governor each year proclaims May as “Beef Month.”

Farm groups have found an unusual ally in state Sen. Carol Blood, a city-dwelling vegetarian from the Omaha suburb of Bellevue. Blood, who grew up on a farm, said she introduced the measure because agriculture is Nebraska’s largest industry and needs to be protected for the good of the whole state.“

I’m not bringing this bill to tell people what they can and can’t eat,” she said. “All I’m asking for is truth in advertising. It’s clear that meat comes from livestock, and livestock is our livelihood in Nebraska.”

Nebraska led the nation in commercial red meat production in 2017 and had the most feed cows as of last year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock and livestock product sales generated an estimated $12.1 billion for the state’s economy in 2016, according to the USDA’s most recent available data.

The measure is certain to face resistance from food producers that sell plant-based alternatives, as well as those working with the emerging science of meat grown by culturing cells in a lab. Critics say the bill infringes on the free-speech rights of companies that produce vegetarian alternatives to real meat.

The Good Food Institute, the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and plant-based food company Tofurkey have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Missouri law . They argue the law unfairly stifles competition.

The Nebraska bill “would censor food labels and create consumer confusion where there is none,” said Jessica Almy, director of policy for the Washington-based Good Food Institute. “You can’t censor speech just to promote one industry’s financial success.”…

FINISH READING: Beef-friendly Nebraska eyes regulations on the word ‘meat’






 

Posted in DONALD TRUMP, HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

Border Wall = High Stakes for Corrupt Politicians In States with High Drug Usage

Nancy Pelosi has a huge constituency of professional cocaine users in California – professionals who vote.

She needs to be recused along with her colleagues who represent states with high cocaine and heroin usage for a conflict of interest when called to participate in any form of legislation or action regarding the application of a physical structure designed to keep out illicit drugs and people coming from regions where drug cartels exist south of the USA border.

Politicians from high drug use states are no different from politicians from high drug producing and exporting countries. Money works the same way on both sides of the southern border to influence politicians, law enforcement and judges to look the other way or to vocally oppose those trying to stop the drug flow and the people coming to the USA to set up underground distribution points and supporting peripheral services.

Everybody knows how to hide money. Even a dog knows how to hide what they don’t want you to see. When you see politicians tipping off their constituency to upcoming ICE raids, you know they’re bought and/or expecting compensation.

When you see politicians fight tooth and nail against the building of a low-cost physical structure on the southern border as a deterrent to illegal immigration, you know they receive benefit, in some form, for appeasing and giving aid and comfort to the cartels operating within the USA.

It’s a done deal. They are as corrupt as the politicians and police in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and any other country that benefits from the drug trade. They all benefit.

Many politicians openly use as an excuse for their inaction and their objection to a physical structure at the southern border that the cartels will just find another way to enter.

Yes. They will. And when they do, we’ll be there.

The USA must show these cartels and their satellite organized crime syndicates, that are allowed to freely operate with impunity in our country by our own paid-off politicians and law enforcement, that we have the will to stop them at every point of entry.

The FBI needs to immediately start investigating those congresspeople who most vehemently opposed a construction process designed to slow the flow of hard drugs and drug cartel-related people as well as all the wannabe El Chapos into the USA. Those politicians who tip off offending parties to raids by ICE or any other law enforcement agency must be stripped of their title and prosecuted.

Those in congress who openly defy the president’s desires and plans to protect this country from being ravaged by these cartels have been bought off and are running like little sissies screaming to the enemy that they’re with them not the USA> Our own congresspeople have flipped.





 

Posted in BORDERS | BOUNDARIES, DONALD TRUMP, HWH COMMENTARY, PALESTINE, POLITICS

DRONES vs CEMENT

The Democrats led by Nancy Pelosi, Speaker Of The House, are lobbying on behalf of the drone industry to use drones instead of cement to keep the floods of people wanting to cross over into the USA illegally from south of the USA border from doing so. A national security issue has turned into a lobbyist special interest windfall potential for companies that make drones.

There’s no money in cement Chuck Schumer might as well have said, when he smirked and body languaged his disdain for anything concrete. After all, there’s no money nor votes in it for him, Nancy Pelosi or any one of their 11% approval rated congressional colleagues. Cement isn’t the gift that keeps giving as drones appear to be. Drones don’t fly themselves and you need a lot of them to secure the border, plus the maintenance and training of bilingual people to operate them.

At least be honest about it. If a wall is immoral, then drones are even more invasive thus immoral. Congress or anybody else can decide at any given time to stop flying the drones. You can’t stop the function of a wall once it’s built. The deterrent is always there. There is no manipulative power with a wall, as there is with drones, which is what the Democrats want.

Massive numbers of drones will create chaos. People will get shot. Drones will be damaged. Nancy Pelosi is thinking Afghanistan where operators in the USA conducted drone strikes on people standing on street corners, or who drove caravans of vehicles to any location. The use of massive numbers of drones by people not sufficiently trained will start a war. And she’s okay with all of that.

Sure drones are useful, but without a barrier, no. We’re not at war yet, so the drones have to be protecting something, which is a wall. If there’s no wall, then anybody can cross the border who is not spotted and pursued by a drone. And what will that do, except put a lot of DEA and Homeland Security agents in danger who have to go after them in trucks once they are spotted after they’ve crossed the border. The Democrats are risking the lives of our own agents for drone contracts without fully understanding the ramifications.

This isn’t a video game, where drone operators can simply pop every person crossing the border illegally.

A drone isn’t a deterrant. People can figure out when they’re flown or get the intel from spies and pass it along. There’s no predictions needed with a wall. It’s always there, so people can’t find out the times that it’s up and the times that it’s down. It’s always up. That’s the deterrant.

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer want to give the drone industry billions of dollars when they haven’t thought this through. Go back and watch how members of congress responded to Mark Zuckerberg from Facebook. They were totally ignorant of computers and Facebook. They are even more ignorant of drones. All they know is what they see in movies.

If I don’t have a ‘no trespassing’ sign with a fence around my property, then people will assume they can be on it. Without a wall, how will the USA win in court against an invasion by people claiming it their right to be here?

This isn’t the Berlin Wall or even the Wall in Israel/Palestine. Those walls created borders that didn’t previously exist, dividing cities and neighborhoods. The USA already has a border. Everybody in the area knows the border. That’s where The People’s Wall goes. People can still go back and forth if they’re legal.

It’s like toll booths to get onto a highway. Why do we have toll booths, if they don’t work? People pay – they are forced to pay – to use the road. If you don’t pay, then find another way to get where you’re going. I think people should pay a toll for crossing over the southern border, given the huge costs to the tax payers in our country for social services because of their disruptive, illegal actions.

What’s immoral is encouraging people to come to a country where they don’t speak the language to do slave labor, to live in poverty and as outlaws generation after generation. That’s immoral. That is perpetuating the cycle of slavery. Forcing them to do jobs that supposedly nobody who is an actual citizen wants is immoral. If you want to move up the socio-economic ladder, you have to speak English or forever be strapped to jobs where only Spanish-speaking people work with Spanish-speaking bosses. Taking advantage of somebody’s economic status like that and then making the process of citizenship so lengthy and cumbersome with fines attached is immoral.

Slavery is alive and well in the USA

A Wall says, go back and work it out in a better way than what you’ll get here. A Wall doesn’t violate human rights. Why do citizens of Mexico, Central and South America have more rights in the USA than USA citizens? A Wall protects the rights of people already here. A Wall is not immoral. Slavery is immoral.

Yeah, Chuck Schumer had dollar signs in his eyes. Drones are the new building contracts to the Israelis.

There’s profit to made in drones, not cement.

The bottom line is that a wall is a deterrent; drones are not.

Drones can only function optimally when there is an actual wall to protect from a breach. Otherwise it’s wide open spaces. How can you say someone breached a wide open space? Border? What border? You mean there’s a border here? Hey man, I was just taking my dog for a walk.

Outposts won’t work either. They’re too small. They’re not efficient.

The current path to citizenship in the USA is a path to nowhere.

Donald Trump didn’t create this mess, but he sure has the courage to take it on.

This citizen would like to see some courage from the 11% approval rated congress and senate. Resistance is a weak strategy for change. You all made the mess by profiting from slave labor and human suffering, now clean it up. Opening the border to exploitation by foreign entities is not a solid solution. It’s a strategic nightmare.






 

Posted in DONALD TRUMP, HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

Hillary Still Whining about Being In The DARK

Considering that Hillary Clinton still can’t wrap her mind around losing the presidential election to Donald Trump, it’s clear that the country made the right decision in choosing her opponent.

From 2016 to 2019 and she still can’t move past it. Three years in the pit.

Vision and the ability to think on one’s feet are two qualities necessary in an effective leader. The way Hillary Clinton handled her defeat proved that she lacks both.

Nobody wants a leader who can’t rise from the ashes quickly.

For all her supposed support for women’s rights, she played the stereotypical woman who crumbles under pressure, and stayed crumbled.

I’m beginning to think she’s mentally ill.






 

Posted in FACEBOOK, MEDIA, POLITICS

I’m Sick Of Hearing About Hillary Paralyzed By Defeat

Photo from Jeff Oring’s Facebook page.

All people need to be represented equally in the political process and given equal access to social services when they qualify.

Laws must apply equally to all people. That includes half the human race – women are the most discriminated against humans on the planet.

It somehow doesn’t look right to blame the woman for the state of affairs of any nation. And then to punish her with loss of benefits because someone didn’t support her freedom to vote for whomever she wanted to vote for? Massive immigration and the cost of free health care, food, housing, clothes, education plus increased funding for those responsible for their care once they cross the border as a result is what drains the budget so that the old white woman who in the 70s fought for all those freedoms for everybody else, gets the shaft.

Yeah, I think that’s ironic. How about fighting for an equal rights amendment for women? Why isn’t there an outrage over women still being forced into subservient roles and jobs? Equal pay for equal work doesn’t exist. But equality doesn’t begin and end there. How about all the women crossing the border? Does anybody really think that they’re going to fight for women’s rights? Not a chance; they’ll set women in this country back instead of move them forward. All they want is the money. They hate Americans and everything else about America. Where’s the money? They essentially get witness protection status upon arriving illegally. Except for the name change, and who really knows about that, since they can’t speak the language, they expect a package – a gift – that includes free rent, food, clothing, healthcare, education, pocket money, job and transportation all for the privilege of gracing this great country with their presence.

There is more to America than Muslims, Mexicans, Gays and Jews. Maybe they should start supporting everybody else, instead of thinking only of themselves. The democrats are taking away that woman’s medicare and social security and giving it via freebies for long periods of time, at least as long as it takes to learn a language in order to get a job and who will baby sit all the born-for-immigration-purposes kids? These people aren’t thinking ahead, only that America will pay for all of it. They have to, otherwise we’ll blow them up and they know it.

The old folks are the ones who always take the hit.

Old woman, yeah.

Senior residences are being filled with young immigrants with or without families from all over the globe, while old white people are getting the boot. I live in one of them, so your words about punishing a white woman who exercised her freedoms, hoping finally somebody would help her, falls on deaf years. The democrats didn’t do it, the republicans won’t do it. I voted for Hillary and all her people do is bitch about their right to be uncivilized.

Hey, I don’t give a damn. Nobody’s fighting for the old white woman – not even Hillary or Obama. The #MeToo movement is not a vote for equal rights for women. It trivializes assaults and rapes against women by focusing on decades-old unwanted kisses and grabs and Hollywood people giving blow jobs in exchange for parts in film. How about focusing on what’s happening now?

Nobody wants to stop human trafficking, because it’s intermingled with massive illegal immigration. That will come back to haunt the democrats. They’re already known as the Party Of Slavery, now they want the Party Of Sex Trafficking added to their prospectus. Plus the right to be uncivilized (from Hillary just this morning). Actually it was “you can’t be civil to…” blah blah anything republican was the target.

Hillary doesn’t know how to be civil and sincere at the same time. That’s her flaw. Those government positions were all given to her. But nobody can work with her. She’s too angry – about everything. She pisses people off. She pissed people off all over the world as Secretary Of State, then wanted their support when she ran for president. They didn’t not want her because she was a woman. They didn’t want her because of her stubborn abrasive style. As it turns out, she exhibited the same traits she hated in her father. “He was gruff”. That’s a nice way of saying ‘mean’. Yeah, well you know what Hillary, if you can’t be civil to your opponents, when working in a public capacity, then you don’t have the right temperament for public office.

I never did like that she threw her father under the bus every time she wanted something. It just didn’t seem right. He was her father after all. Obama did the same thing with his father. Bill Clinton did the same with his.

Didn’t anybody ever teach you coping skills? Why didn’t you learn them on your own?

Oh right, ‘stay mad forever’ is easier than looking at your own responsibility to move forward in a positive not destruction motion.

This constant pity-seeking behavior justifying all the wrong moves made at every juncture is not going to put you back into anybody’s good graces.

You didn’t just lose an election, you fell from grace by your own self-destructive design. I voted for who I thought was a strong progressive woman, who as it turns out was a fake. She was only acting the part. She crumbled like an old stale cookie when she lost. That’s on me. I’m just glad you didn’t win. Anybody who takes this long to get over something isn’t suited for public office.

Stop dragging the entire world through your mud. It’s beginning to sound pathological.

In case you don’t know it yet, nobody wants to see you go through psychological therapy in public. I can see that coming.

By the way, what do Jews and Gays have to do with a white woman’s social security and medicare benefits?






 

Posted in DONALD TRUMP, HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

Death Of A Movement Wish

I’m giving you the tagline right off the bat, so you lazy activist readers who like to jump on whatever it is that anybody else is saying or doing that doesn’t line up with your distorted perception of reality can move on to your next target.

Picking the wrong battles to fight, because something pops up on your radar and because it did, it must be designed specifically for you to raise, or because you think you might just be able to make it fit, while the real battles, the ones of substance – the gut-wrenching glory battles – pass you by.

This is called DEATH OF A MOVEMENT WISH.

American women make the same mistakes American blacks make to keep themselves irrelevant, thus enslaved.

They pick up every argument – shotgun approach – whether it fits the discrimination or not. They work it to death trying to force-fit it to their agenda and in the end lose ground.

People see through that. They see the hypocrisy of a goal that justifies any means to attain it, making it look like you’d rather shed somebody’s blood than pursue a diplomatic solution. The activists driving these HATE AND DESTROY CAMPAIGNS to achieve their agendas state as their reason, that all conflict must at some point along the continuum to resolution result in violence and bloodshed and a significant amount of loss in order to bring all sides to the resolution table.

It sounds like war mongering to most ears. Violence and hatred is not a prerequisite for social or any other category of change.

When people see activists exhibit the same behavior they protest, the populace and the shakers and movers turn against the protestors and their message. Any cause needs those people at minimum to agree with your goals. But none have been stated. Women and blacks never state the goal. What do you want? They’re afraid if they say, they might get it, and regret not asking for more? We shouldn’t have to ask? Then why are you protesting? Using that logic, you shouldn’t have to protest either.

Every individual in the movement has a different demand.

Organize.

Who do you think the government is, God? You’re talking to people here, not making a wish to your God. State what you want, the way you want this country, this world to be, detailed. Or they put droves of ignorant talking heads on cable news shows to act ignorant, as if ignorance will make the shakers and movers get for you what you want?

Really? That’s a strategy?

You’re all pathetic. Get off the stage, till you have something of substance to say, then say it in a succinct, positive, good for all, way.

You claim to be better, to know and possess a better way, but you don’t act or show it.

Share it.

You trivialize the woman and the black by focusing on trivial offenses. Using the nigger word, or grabbing somebody’s crotch in a high school party free for all? He tried to kiss me and grabbed at my clothes? Well, he called me the same thing as the nigger word, he bitch me?

You really do have a Death Of A Movement Wish (DOAMW). You don’t even want to be doing this.

Making up scenarios that you think happen all the time, so you ‘Hollywood’ it, like Hollywood does with the news, using actors as the OPINIONS of the people on the street interviewed for news shows. For entertainment purposes or to sway public opinion? Making black waiters scribble “i don’t tip black people’ on the restaurant bill, claiming a white customer did it, then stand all smiles while the cameras click away? And you just happened to have the telephone number of a major mainline news source junkie?

The best move the congressional democrats can make now: Vote YES for Brett Kavanaugh as Supreme Court Justice

You know you wanted him. The others convinced you that they could bring him to his knees, because of his Irish roots, forcing him to change his views to your way of thinking. He was the most malleable. They stereotyped him. He’s Irish – a slam dunk, walk in the park NO. He’s Irish. They drink a lot and when they drink a lot, they womanize – a stereotype that everybody gets regardless of how unfair it is. Democrats are the party of fair for all marginalized groups. Who forgot that? Who started this parade? You went after the IRISH? Hm-m.

Dems Vote YES for Kavanaugh. 

We did our due diligence. We’re convinced he will be fair in matters that concern us – (especially now that we’ve destroyed his family and friends using the Irish stereotype lol. Just kidding BK; we knew you could handle it. Hey, we know where your children go to school.lol.).






 

Posted in DONALD TRUMP, HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

High School Behavior Litmus Test For Supreme Court Nominees – BEWARE the slippery slope

Right now as I write, there are thousands of young women and children being drugged and raped by their trafficking handlers to be sold into slavery, right here in the USA. It’s happening in Cleveland, Ohio, and even in the building where I live. There are not enough allocated resources to handle the volume of cases yet to be discovered.

And yet, congressional democrats in Washington DC think it’s a more prudent utilization of time and resources for the FBI (Federal Bureau Of Investigation) to get into their time capsule machines and time-travel back to 1972 to peep on who was getting into whose pants in high school, for the purpose of coddling and appeasing those who wish to block a Supreme Court Justice nominee by calling into question the moral fitness of said person who allegedly groped a teen apparently of the opposite sex, while at a high school party, where there was underage drinking.

If this is the future litmus test for Supreme Court nominees or any other position, you might as well disqualify all men from consideration.

It appears that the underlying motive for creating this ‘high school boy and girl’ sex spectacle is to assure in the future that only women get nominated to these powerful positions. Both teenagers were underage at the time, which means the FBI would have needed parental permission to delve into the sexual behaviors of their respective teenage children.

Whatever is discovered by the FBI by time-flying back to 1972 will not be credible enough to use in a court of law. It will all be heresay from 36 years ago. If it’s not credible enough to be used in a court of law to prove there was a crime committed, when a sex act did not occur, but even if it did, who is to say whether it was consensual or not consensual, then it cannot be used to block a nomination. The FBI would then be rightly accused of colluding with congressional democrats to take down the current president’s nominee for the Supreme Court and replacing the president’s choice with a person the democrats want in that position. This takes away from the president his right to choose.

The process of approving a nominee is corrupted, when the opposing party forces the party members of the nominee to allow them to demand that the FBI investigate a situation where there was no crime committed in exchange for an up or down vote.

The timing of this allegation of groping points to the malicious attempt to malign a person’s reputation based on his political leanings and not his rabble rousing in high school. Do you all want your teen years to be held up for scrutiny by congressional democrats every time you apply for a job, a raise or a promotion? Do you want your teenage children to be forever tied to mistakes they may or may not have made in high school, just because someone sees an opportunity to destroy them 36 years later?

This is that slippery slope.

The FBI will be setting a precedent that can never be reversed.

Taking on an investigation of a high school party 36 years ago, where no crime was committed by the person who is being accused of groping and allegedly making someone so fearful of the grope that 36 years later she’s still publicly crying over it, will also malign the reputation of the FBI. The congressional democrats want only to destroy this person’s possibility of sitting on the court. They do not care who gets maligned in the process, or whose reputation it destroys. The end justifies the means for them.

Congressional democrats are not thinking rationally. I hope the FBI is.

According to news sources, and news sources say they never lie: the woman who testified was paid to date 700 thousand dollars by GOFUNDME accounts set up in her name. This is what needs to be investigated. She’s a doctor; she’s not poor nor in need of expensive surgery (she could afford it) – unless it’s the type of surgery not covered by insurance. This was a pay out for her performance.






 

Posted in DONALD TRUMP, HWH COMMENTARY, POLITICS

‘The Biggest Threat to Our Democracy Is Indifference.’ Barack Obama Kicks off Midterm Campaigning

HWH COMMENT:

Re:“The biggest threat to our democracy is indifference” said by Obama gearing up for campaigning for mid-term elections on his quest to save American democracy.

One thing to be sure about the world today, especially in America, there is no indifference – not from anyone nor any sector.

People from all walks hold strong views about everything.

Protests are more common throughout the land than ever. Social media is lit with power hungry reactionaries, wanting to change your thought process into theirs – again from all walks.

Americans are not standing still – no matter their agendas.

Words used in the past to stir a nation (such as ‘indifference’) are no longer useful.

Obama acts desperate to be president again, like Bill Clinton did. Once you have that power you never want to let it go. So hey, use it in a new, better way, not a way that didn’t work. Nobody is indifferent. Not now.

The biggest threat to democracy is people in authority using fear tactics to tell the populace how to vote. How about we hold those who campaign for an agenda to the same standards we demand of Donald Trump? It looks to me like nobody is playing by their own rules.

Politicians want Trump to solve all the problems they didn’t solve or currently can’t solve. So, they lay all the blame at his doorstep instead of their own. Rather than work with him, to change what they couldn’t or won’t, they attack and resist for the sake of resisting, till they get into office and everybody elected forgets what they promised to do to get that vote. The democrats are playing the same resist and wait till the next elections game that the republicans did.

What’s new and better about that strategy? Nothing. It’s more of the same. That’s why voter turnout is low, and has been for a long time. It’s not because of apathy on the part of the voters, it’s because of slow moving politicians who delay making decisions that will provoke change.

Tactical Abuse is the new strategy to produce that change. Hit them over their heads till they cave to your way is the lazy person’s game plan to change the world. That methodology used to be called the end justifies the means, or ‘whatever it takes’ as long as it gets done is worth the price of life and limb.

Whoa.

Has planet earth been invaded by a silent war organism that strips the brain of all logic and common sense and decency, so it can occupy the minds of humans for the purpose of taking over the planet?

It sure looks, walks and sounds it to me.

Not all democrats are worthy of the office they seek. Not all republicans are worthy of the office they seek. Yet each side pushes all their candidates down your throats till you choke and end up voting for no one.

Everybody knows that no matter who you vote for, not much is going to change, regardless of the party that lands the coveted seats.

Why did Obama promise Israel that he would move the American embassy to Jerusalem? To get the Jew vote he lied.

Source: ‘The Biggest Threat to Our Democracy Is Indifference.’ Barack Obama Kicks off Midterm Campaigning