I’m Sick Of Hearing About Hillary Paralyzed By Defeat

Photo from Jeff Oring’s Facebook page.

All people need to be represented equally in the political process and given equal access to social services when they qualify.

Laws must apply equally to all people. That includes half the human race – women are the most discriminated against humans on the planet.

It somehow doesn’t look right to blame the woman for the state of affairs of any nation. And then to punish her with loss of benefits because someone didn’t support her freedom to vote for whomever she wanted to vote for? Massive immigration and the cost of free health care, food, housing, clothes, education plus increased funding for those responsible for their care once they cross the border as a result is what drains the budget so that the old white woman who in the 70s fought for all those freedoms for everybody else, gets the shaft.

Yeah, I think that’s ironic. How about fighting for an equal rights amendment for women? Why isn’t there an outrage over women still being forced into subservient roles and jobs? Equal pay for equal work doesn’t exist. But equality doesn’t begin and end there. How about all the women crossing the border? Does anybody really think that they’re going to fight for women’s rights? Not a chance; they’ll set women in this country back instead of move them forward. All they want is the money. They hate Americans and everything else about America. Where’s the money? They essentially get witness protection status upon arriving illegally. Except for the name change, and who really knows about that, since they can’t speak the language, they expect a package – a gift – that includes free rent, food, clothing, healthcare, education, pocket money, job and transportation all for the privilege of gracing this great country with their presence.

There is more to America than Muslims, Mexicans, Gays and Jews. Maybe they should start supporting everybody else, instead of thinking only of themselves. The democrats are taking away that woman’s medicare and social security and giving it via freebies for long periods of time, at least as long as it takes to learn a language in order to get a job and who will baby sit all the born-for-immigration-purposes kids? These people aren’t thinking ahead, only that America will pay for all of it. They have to, otherwise we’ll blow them up and they know it.

The old folks are the ones who always take the hit.

Old woman, yeah.

Senior residences are being filled with young immigrants with or without families from all over the globe, while old white people are getting the boot. I live in one of them, so your words about punishing a white woman who exercised her freedoms, hoping finally somebody would help her, falls on deaf years. The democrats didn’t do it, the republicans won’t do it. I voted for Hillary and all her people do is bitch about their right to be uncivilized.

Hey, I don’t give a damn. Nobody’s fighting for the old white woman – not even Hillary or Obama. The #MeToo movement is not a vote for equal rights for women. It trivializes assaults and rapes against women by focusing on decades-old unwanted kisses and grabs and Hollywood people giving blow jobs in exchange for parts in film. How about focusing on what’s happening now?

Nobody wants to stop human trafficking, because it’s intermingled with massive illegal immigration. That will come back to haunt the democrats. They’re already known as the Party Of Slavery, now they want the Party Of Sex Trafficking added to their prospectus. Plus the right to be uncivilized (from Hillary just this morning). Actually it was “you can’t be civil to…” blah blah anything republican was the target.

Hillary doesn’t know how to be civil and sincere at the same time. That’s her flaw. Those government positions were all given to her. But nobody can work with her. She’s too angry – about everything. She pisses people off. She pissed people off all over the world as Secretary Of State, then wanted their support when she ran for president. They didn’t not want her because she was a woman. They didn’t want her because of her stubborn abrasive style. As it turns out, she exhibited the same traits she hated in her father. “He was gruff”. That’s a nice way of saying ‘mean’. Yeah, well you know what Hillary, if you can’t be civil to your opponents, when working in a public capacity, then you don’t have the right temperament for public office.

I never did like that she threw her father under the bus every time she wanted something. It just didn’t seem right. He was her father after all. Obama did the same thing with his father. Bill Clinton did the same with his.

Didn’t anybody ever teach you coping skills? Why didn’t you learn them on your own?

Oh right, ‘stay mad forever’ is easier than looking at your own responsibility to move forward in a positive not destruction motion.

This constant pity-seeking behavior justifying all the wrong moves made at every juncture is not going to put you back into anybody’s good graces.

You didn’t just lose an election, you fell from grace by your own self-destructive design. I voted for who I thought was a strong progressive woman, who as it turns out was a fake. She was only acting the part. She crumbled like an old stale cookie when she lost. That’s on me. I’m just glad you didn’t win. Anybody who takes this long to get over something isn’t suited for public office.

Stop dragging the entire world through your mud. It’s beginning to sound pathological.

In case you don’t know it yet, nobody wants to see you go through psychological therapy in public. I can see that coming.

By the way, what do Jews and Gays have to do with a white woman’s social security and medicare benefits?



Will Jordan abolish a law that protects rapists?

Women’s activists say they are closer than ever to abolishing Article 308, which pardons rapists who marry their victim.

Will Jordan abolish a law that protects rapists? Women’s activists say they are closer than ever to abolishing Article 308, which pardons rapists who marry their victim.

 Lebanon is also making strides to abolish a similar provision in the Lebanese Penal Code, known as Article 522 [EPA].


After more than a decade of lobbying and campaigning, women’s rights activists and officials in Jordan say they are closer than ever to abolishing a law allowing rapists to escape punishment if they marry their victim.

This week, the Jordanian government voted to get rid of Article 308 of the Penal Code. The article permits pardoning rape perpetrators if they marry their victims and stay with them for at least three years, provided the victim is between 15 and 18 years old.

“It’s a huge step on the part of the government. It shows commitment. Usually, women’s issues in Jordan are shoved to the back, but the government showed some seriousness with this vote. This is a very important and long-awaited step,” women’s rights activist and writer Rana Husseini told Al Jazeera.

The cabinet vote comes after months of heated debate on the controversial issue. In October 2016, Jordan’s King Abdullah II ordered the establishment of a royal committee to reform the judiciary and review the entire Penal Code, which dates back to 1960.

IN PICTURES: Women in Jordan fight for their rights

In February, the committee recommended abolishing the article, leading the Jordanian government to endorse the suggestion on Sunday.

Though the move was hailed as a victory by women’s groups, there remains much uncertainty and doubt over whether the parliament will approve its repeal. Parliamentary sessions following Sunday’s vote revealed deep divisions among deputies in Jordan’s lower house surrounding the issue

For the provision to be abolished, the Jordanian parliament will still have to debate and vote in favour of its removal, and it could be months before parliament discusses the matter.

Parliamentarian and champion of women’s rights Wafaa Bani Mustafa said she was slightly worried after this week’s discussions. “There were some voices speaking against the removal of this article,” Bani Mustafa told Al Jazeera.

“Many MPs still believe that this law is needed to ‘protect’ women and ‘guard their honour’, which is an opinion I strongly disagree with. This is one of the ugliest laws targeting women,” she added.

Husseini said the strong backlash in parliament has dented the confidence of those working to have it repealed. “I thought society was ready, but the sessions in parliament were not a very good sign,” said Husseini.

“It’s not going to be an easy battle. There are many deputies that are against anything good for women. In their eyes, if a woman is raped, she has no chance of getting married, and … she will bring dishonour and shame to her family, so it is best for her to marry her rapist.”

Finish reading: Will Jordan abolish a law that protects rapists? | | Al Jazeera



BILL COSBY admits to rape

When you drug someone for the purpose of having compliant sex, that’s rape.






One can’t sanitize the garbage that comes out of Donald Trump’s mind by calling it politically incorrect, as Donald himself has claimed it to be. Garbage in, garbage out. So I’m guessing that his so-called politically incorrect speech is his way of clearing out everybody else’s garbage that enters his space – immediately without hesitation, without debate, without any kind of internal consideration he hurls it right back at them – or waits a few hours, then attacks.

And he’s vicious doing it; he’s mean as all get out in comparison to the insult or inaccurate blurb hurled at him in a semi-politically correct manner. And he doesn’t let up. He buries the person in insults. He sees something, hears something that’s inaccurate to his way of thinking, and he jumps in protest – a long, drawn-out protest. Counter-punching he calls it. Problem is, he’s almost always in that mode. Here we go again, Rosie O’Donnell all over again.

Politically incorrect implies gaffes, social type gaffes, that everybody seems to want to avoid like the plague, and for good reason. We’ve all seen how people’s careers and lives get ruined by saying something that is identified as politically incorrect. The vengeance that comes out of the group offended toward the individual who spoke in a politically incorrect way, is just plain vicious. It tears the politically incorrect statement or word an individual uttered, into shreds of human flesh, burning at the pit, devoured by the offended in orgasmic satisfaction. It is repulsive.

But then comes Donald Trump and does a turn about. He’s the one tearing to shreds the ones who usually tear everybody else to shreds via the nightly news and cable news channels. They sit in judgement of everybody else, day after day, night after night; they get it their way, because they not only have the last word, they have every word. There’s no rebuttal by the masses. The opinion of the masses never gets heard – unless it’s through a government agency pretending to be the person on the street, or the person on social media, speaking on behalf of the street.

Well, you know what? Donald Trump is saying what the populace is thinking, and everybody is shocked. Even the government agencies who thought all along that they were getting it ‘right on’ reading the thoughts of  the average American somebody – only to find out they couldn’t have been more wrong. Edward Snowden, NSA whistle-blower, gets it right again. And Donald Trump is getting away with it. And everybody is loving every second of it. They want more. They don’t really care who he insults, just keep doing it.

I don’t believe that’s his strategy; that’s just him. He can’t help himself. And by him not being able to help himself, he is helping everybody else by raising issues, whereby he is the offending person; he is putting himself out there as the offender, so issues that nobody talks about get talked about. Not on purpose. It’s just happening that way. Immigration (rapists and drug dealers coming across the borders), calling out Senator John McCain for exploiting his military service for personal gain – year after year after decade, [then voted for torture] (my insert); using the rape word to describe some immigrants coming across the southern border, then to be accused of rape himself by a previous wife in a divorce proceeding, who then retracted it, but it raised the issue of spousal rape. And everybody talked about it. And now that he’s going at it with journalist, Megyn Kelly, over sexist comments he made to and about women, the sexist word is being bantered about. People are taking a stand, though it might be short-lived, against disparaging comments made toward women by men. It’s front and center in the news.

Donald Trump is again saying what everybody’s thinking, or what people are saying privately away from the camera and microphone. What he says about women, are views that most of the male population hold towards women. The way he talks about women is the way men talk about women, when women aren’t around – and often even when they are.

The other candidates weren’t so offended by his sexist comments; they were more concerned about Trump poisoning the pool of nominees, that could hurt each individual’s chance of becoming that nominee, based on how much the public thought each nominee to mirror Trump’s thoughts. But of course the greater concern is being able to win an election in 2016 with the sexist label pinned on the lapel of the Republican party, even though they are sexist. Being against an equal rights amendment for women, against equal pay for equal work, being against a woman’s right to choose to do what she wants to do with her own body, then taking away the right to purchase birth control pills under certain health insurance policies all add up to sexism.

The Democrats are sexist too, so don’t anybody kid themselves here. Half the human race and most of the female race is sexist toward women. Is that the women’s own fault. No.

I spoke about it for years, everybody laughed, said be a good sport, laugh at yourself, don’t take life so seriously, you create your own problems in life, if somebody doesn’t give you a promotion, it’s because you didn’t fight like a man, or you could get pregnant and need time off, or the most damaging: it makes a woman look weak to be pointing out sexism where sexism breeds.

Sexism is a problem in all people’s lives. But it’s not a problem caused by women or that can be fixed by women. It’s like telling the tortured person to stop their own torture by compliance, but even if the tortured person complies, the torture continues. It is the offender that must change, not the one victimized. Well, consider yourself a victim and sure you’re going to get victimized. They always have a smart answer don’t they? Always a way to blame the person they’re bullying for the reason why they got bullied. Fight back, be like they are. Rosie O’Donnell did that and the fight went on forever. I don’t know who finally won, but Donald Trump got the last word in on the night of the Republican debate just by mentioning her name, and everybody had a big laugh at her expense.

Jeb Bush said that pregnant girls should be publicly shamed for getting pregnant. Here comes that scarlet letter directed only at the ‘evil’ girl for letting herself get pregnant. How about the ‘evil’ boy, that played a greater than fifty-percent role in that pregnancy? No public shaming for him? Herein lies the bias. The prejudice. The sexism. The problem is, I don’t think Jeb Bush was just shooting his mouth off. I think he believes what he said, even though he’ll have to at some point back pedal that thought.

Donald Trump may have a sizzle over substance strategy, and it might work. But the second the populace thinks that he’s playing them, it’ll be over before Trump can open his mind to speak.

Donald Trump keeps saying that he doesn’t have time to be politically correct, but he seems to have an inordinate, endless amount of time to be politically incorrect. Therein lies the contradiction – massive detail regarding every insult, offense, vengeance generated tit for tat, but slow and low on the details of any comprehensive or substantive plan on any issue that concerns Americans.

Build a wall, bomb ISIS, make deals with China, Russia, Mexico, and now he loves women is all I’ve gotten out of all he has said to date. The tit for tat drowns out everything else. The tit for tat is what people remember. And for a while maybe it’s best to address these other issues brought to the forefront by Donald Trump, and to keep them in the forefront. It’s time that women’s rights become a foundation of the platform of both parties – and not just reproduction rights, all rights.

In the afternoon debate, nearly all candidates, maybe all, firmly stated that they would undo every single executive order by President Obama immediately upon taking office. What mind are they pandering to? Obviously not the mind that they thought was the mind of the average Republican American, otherwise they wouldn’t all be so shocked at Donald Trump’s popularity.

All candidates from both parties need to rethink the individual and collective mind of America. Know that they think like you think, not how you speak (except for Donald). Come up with something new for a change. Give a condensed, detailed plan, not a bumper sticker. I think the public is telling the candidates that they have a brain, even though nobody is believing it – yet. They want clarity. They want truth. They’re sick and tired of being lied to and treated as if they’re brainless, and couldn’t figure out anything on their own.

Right now, people think pretty much how I think. After all the talking dust settles, it doesn’t matter who gets into office, or what party wins, they’re all basically the same; the only difference being the temperament of the individual.

Represent the people, not what you think is best for the people, because they’re too dumb to know what you know is in their best interest. How arrogant and self-serving is that?

Make policy plans that will help all Americans soar, not suffer because of your policy mistakes of the past. The one percent may pay for your run, but you can’t win with one percent of the vote.

The smooth talking political candidate isn’t working anymore. Unfortunately, or fortunately, repulsive now attracts. Repulsive raised some issues that are indeed repulsive and need to be worked on in every sector of society. Had someone come forward and just been honest, absent the insults (and everybody is hurling them), I believe the people would have put their energy behind that person. People want raw (and in this case, raw became repulsive), because raw they can at least understand as real, and then they choose to agree or disagree – based on facts, not rhetoric. It is not the candidate’s job to choose for them. That’s exactly what people don’t want.

All you can do as a candidate is to choose to be the best candidate that you can be for ‘we the people’ by thinking like they think, which is like you think! People across the board, are more informed than they’ve ever been. Know that, understand that going forward. Nobody likes being talked down to, so talk up.

Big soul hug to all candidates from all parties from yours truly.

%d bloggers like this: